your right. Run far for making me look stupid! 
No, three reasons:
(1) Fans of many teams should get to enjoy their team playing on Thanksgiving from time-to-time. It's a great day for football -weather's changing, families together, etc. Plus, since it's two NFC teams, AFC fans rarely get a chance to see their team play on Thanksgiving. This shouldn't be owned by two teams every season, but rotated around the league.
(2) It's an unfair competitive advantage. Dallas and Detroit get a home game on a shortened week every year. Teams having to travel to play them with only a few days between games are at a disadvantage, though clearly this has not been much help for Detroit.
(3) The NFL should be showcasing competitive and meaningful games, which will only happen occasionally if the same two teams are always involved, regardless of which teams they are. They should wait until week 7 or so and decide which games will be on Thanksgiving. Put in some games between top teams and some classic rivalries. Wouldn't it be great to see Chicago-Green Bay on T'giving? Or imagine if tomorrow featured Bucs-Ravens and Eagles-Bears instead of two games with teams with lopsided records.
I just tire of the Dallas and Detroit for the sake of Dallas and Detroit tradition. It's worn. Time for a change. The fans in those two cities will disagree and probably like "their" tradition, but it'd be better for all fans and the game to switch it up.
... I've always been a Bruins fan alongside the Rangers. I made the decision to just support one team, and I've always enjoyed Bruins hockey more. I like the way they run things, and I find the team more exciting even if they tank. I only supported the Rangers more before because they were closer, and I attended more games live. They were the first team I saw when I got back into hockey... but like I said before, I enjoy Boston more, so I dropped the Blueshirts completely. No prank
With Jacobs as the owner, I would think that would be a reason NOT to like the Bruins.
