- Thread starter
- #1
SteelerKing
Active Member
First, Money is an absolute tool. I've crossed paths with this guy twice now and on both occasions he's demonstrated a level of reading comprehension and intellect that is rivaled by most 3 year olds in the final throes of death from fetal alcohol syndrome. When he has no rebuttal to something, he has to resort to petty insults. Yesterday I bullshitted two such posts from him, he cried about it, and then his tampon fell out and he proceeded to go back through the thread and drop poopies on all 15 of my posts up to that point. That's got to be a single day record around here. 17 poopies in all now, with two of them being from Tgann. I heart Raisins fans.
But I digress.
How is any of this wrong: Does Fantasy Football dictate how we judge players? | Page 4 | SportsHoopla Sports Forums ?
I've presented these same arguments before as a counter to all the nonsensical misconceptions and flawed perceptions that get thrown around on sports message boards, but very few people ever get it and I don't understand why. They're very basic concepts backed by sound reasoning and logic. At their core, the stats are the numerical recording of a player's performance. I haven't seen a single Falcons game this year, but I can conclude that Julio Jones is having a great year by looking at the numbers. How am I wrong? I didn't watch Bryce Harper play a single game during the MLB season, but I can conclude he had a great year - and the best of any player in the National League - by looking at the numbers as well. Lo and behold, he was league MVP. How do I know that without watching? I also don't watch too many NBA games anymore, but somehow I know that players like Steph Curry, Lebron James, Kevin Durant, and Anthony Davis are the league's best players. How? The numbers tell me so.
I kept track of my own stats after each and every game as a star in both football and basketball so I have an intimate and first hand understanding of the correlation between performance and the numbers. They don't lie. If you're playing well, the numbers are going to reflect that. If you're playing poorly, they'll reflect that too. So why is this such a difficult concept for everybody? The only conclusion that I can draw is that people are just simply going to believe whatever they want to believe and when the stats don't support the myths they've created about a player, it's because the stats are wrong or they aren't really telling the story. And that's nonsense. I never had a game where I played exceptionally well, but posted poor numbers statistically, and I never had a bad game where I lit up the stat sheet. Unlike everybody else, apparently, I don't watch every snap from all 32 NFL teams each and every week so I rely heavily on the stats to tell me who's playing well around the league, which defenses are the best and which offenses are the best, but I've evidently got it all wrong and am just a stat geek who knows nothing about sports. So please help me understand how I needed to have watched every game from Bryce Harper, Steph Curry, Lebron James, Kevin Durant, Anthony Davis, Julio Jones, Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, etc ad nauseam in order to be able to conclude that they are/were some of the best players in the league in a given season and where the flaws are in my method of tracking, evaluating, and comparing. Thanks.
But I digress.
How is any of this wrong: Does Fantasy Football dictate how we judge players? | Page 4 | SportsHoopla Sports Forums ?
I've presented these same arguments before as a counter to all the nonsensical misconceptions and flawed perceptions that get thrown around on sports message boards, but very few people ever get it and I don't understand why. They're very basic concepts backed by sound reasoning and logic. At their core, the stats are the numerical recording of a player's performance. I haven't seen a single Falcons game this year, but I can conclude that Julio Jones is having a great year by looking at the numbers. How am I wrong? I didn't watch Bryce Harper play a single game during the MLB season, but I can conclude he had a great year - and the best of any player in the National League - by looking at the numbers as well. Lo and behold, he was league MVP. How do I know that without watching? I also don't watch too many NBA games anymore, but somehow I know that players like Steph Curry, Lebron James, Kevin Durant, and Anthony Davis are the league's best players. How? The numbers tell me so.
I kept track of my own stats after each and every game as a star in both football and basketball so I have an intimate and first hand understanding of the correlation between performance and the numbers. They don't lie. If you're playing well, the numbers are going to reflect that. If you're playing poorly, they'll reflect that too. So why is this such a difficult concept for everybody? The only conclusion that I can draw is that people are just simply going to believe whatever they want to believe and when the stats don't support the myths they've created about a player, it's because the stats are wrong or they aren't really telling the story. And that's nonsense. I never had a game where I played exceptionally well, but posted poor numbers statistically, and I never had a bad game where I lit up the stat sheet. Unlike everybody else, apparently, I don't watch every snap from all 32 NFL teams each and every week so I rely heavily on the stats to tell me who's playing well around the league, which defenses are the best and which offenses are the best, but I've evidently got it all wrong and am just a stat geek who knows nothing about sports. So please help me understand how I needed to have watched every game from Bryce Harper, Steph Curry, Lebron James, Kevin Durant, Anthony Davis, Julio Jones, Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, etc ad nauseam in order to be able to conclude that they are/were some of the best players in the league in a given season and where the flaws are in my method of tracking, evaluating, and comparing. Thanks.