- Thread starter
- #1
PolarVortex
Nanook of the North
Thanks to Bill James and other sabermetricians, ERA isn't as valued of a stat as it was 40 years ago. But, it is still a stat in which the winner (he with the lowest qualifying ERA) gets instant recognition.
But, the minimum number of innings a pitcher must throw to qualify for the ERA crown (162) has not changed in 100 years while the number of innings the average starting pitcher throws has been in steady decline for at least 35 years. Seems like it is time to lower the required number of innings a pitcher needs to qualify for the ERA title?
Eovaldi threw 140 IPs last year and had a 1.73 ERA. He should be the ERA champ in my book.
But, the minimum number of innings a pitcher must throw to qualify for the ERA crown (162) has not changed in 100 years while the number of innings the average starting pitcher throws has been in steady decline for at least 35 years. Seems like it is time to lower the required number of innings a pitcher needs to qualify for the ERA title?
Eovaldi threw 140 IPs last year and had a 1.73 ERA. He should be the ERA champ in my book.























