broncosmitty
Banned in Europe
You should be good now OBX.
The universe has corrected itself.
The universe has corrected itself.
You should be good now OBX.
The universe has corrected itself.
Something may have to be done about the foot..this is becoming too often, and back to back years across all MBBRL leaguesI was going to be pissed if I had lost the #1 pick because i beat someone who has two byes in his lineup and the players on his bench to make up the difference. Still a little miffed over it.
I was going to be pissed if I had lost the #1 pick because i beat someone who has two byes in his lineup and the players on his bench to make up the difference. Still a little miffed over it.
Yeah, I was praying for Cooks to haul in a couple of bombs. I was a bit peeved when the defender was able to knock the ball out on that one bomb.@HaroldSeattle , good match; ya had me easily if not for Mahomes channeling early Joe Namath.
I was going to be pissed if I had lost the #1 pick because i beat someone who has two byes in his lineup and the players on his bench to make up the difference. Still a little miffed over it.
I never thought I would have to bring it up in this league, but I think in this kind of scenario, somebody with commissioner access should go in and change the lineup of the offending team. If there are blank spots or bye week guys left in the lineup and there are people available on the bench, for the integrity of the league, the commissioner should have the right to go in and switch out the lineup. Obviously this wouldn't work if say your tight end is on bye and you don't have another one on your team, because the commissioner can't decide who to pick up or who to drop, but in the case that you have Travis Kelce in this week and you have another tight end on your bench that's playing, I think the commissioner should have the right to make that change. What do you guys think?
I never thought I would have to bring it up in this league, but I think in this kind of scenario, somebody with commissioner access should go in and change the lineup of the offending team. If there are blank spots or bye week guys left in the lineup and there are people available on the bench, for the integrity of the league, the commissioner should have the right to go in and switch out the lineup. Obviously this wouldn't work if say your tight end is on bye and you don't have another one on your team, because the commissioner can't decide who to pick up or who to drop, but in the case that you have Travis Kelce in this week and you have another tight end on your bench that's playing, I think the commissioner should have the right to make that change. What do you guys think?
I'd have no objections so long as its players on a bye (with available replacements), or a team that hasn't been "managed" for at least a couple weeks..I.e...no changes to the lineup, no waiver pickups, trades..etc. Something at at least appears to be "abandonment", not just a one week oops.
Absolutely no way should an " add/drop" be done. I feel if we authorize the commish to do that, regardless of the reasoning, the integrity of the league is zilch.
What I want to avoid is the possible game time decision, or even late in the week injury status change which results in a guy not playing falling under this umbrella. I know I set my lineup on either Tuesday or Wednesday, and hopefully catch anything that comes up and adjust accordingly. And, in my case, I take it personal if someone gets into my team and adjusts my lineup, even if its to my benefit. Unless of course I asked them to ahead of time. Its like telling me that you think I don't care enough and the effort I made just isnt good enough, when in reality, you have no clue what could be going on as to why I wasn't able to catch that late injury.
Not to mention, the last thing I want to do Sunday morning is comb through people's lineups when I've got plenty of my own to worry about, not to mention whatever real life is going on. I have to imagine OBX has at least some similar feelings in that regard. But if we're aware there's a team that is slipping, I have no issues checking up on that one team. Again, that would require it to be a more than one week type thing.
Obviously that's not exactly what we're talking about here. The team in question has pretty definitively been neglected, if not outright abandoned, so in this case, yes, I'm fine with commish intervention. I just want there to be very clear guidelines going forward with regards to the precedent that will be set, should we choose to start doing this.
I'd have no objections so long as its players on a bye (with available replacements), or a team that hasn't been "managed" for at least a couple weeks..I.e...no changes to the lineup, no waiver pickups, trades..etc. Something at at least appears to be "abandonment", not just a one week oops.
Absolutely no way should an " add/drop" be done. I feel if we authorize the commish to do that, regardless of the reasoning, the integrity of the league is zilch.
What I want to avoid is the possible game time decision, or even late in the week injury status change which results in a guy not playing falling under this umbrella. I know I set my lineup on either Tuesday or Wednesday, and hopefully catch anything that comes up and adjust accordingly. And, in my case, I take it personal if someone gets into my team and adjusts my lineup, even if its to my benefit. Unless of course I asked them to ahead of time. Its like telling me that you think I don't care enough and the effort I made just isnt good enough, when in reality, you have no clue what could be going on as to why I wasn't able to catch that late injury.
Not to mention, the last thing I want to do Sunday morning is comb through people's lineups when I've got plenty of my own to worry about, not to mention whatever real life is going on. I have to imagine OBX has at least some similar feelings in that regard. But if we're aware there's a team that is slipping, I have no issues checking up on that one team. Again, that would require it to be a more than one week type thing.
Obviously that's not exactly what we're talking about here. The team in question has pretty definitively been neglected, if not outright abandoned, so in this case, yes, I'm fine with commish intervention. I just want there to be very clear guidelines going forward with regards to the precedent that will be set, should we choose to start doing this.
Then they don't.What if they don’t though? That is what we are trying to avoid
I'm aware.But we have rules oregenting intentional tanking which not setting a legal lineup is
Those rules only really set the penalties going forward, they don't really safeguard the current "integrity" of matchups.But we have rules oregenting intentional tanking which not setting a legal lineup is