- Thread starter
- #1
Schmoopy1000
When all else fails, Smack em' in the Mouth!
When will they realize they need Bell to win games!
Replace him with burnt toast or jumpin joe?When will they realize they need Bell to win games!
He's certainly better than 2017 Bell and I don't think anyone can say they'd be better off with Bell moving forward considering age, wear and Bell's just overall bad attitude.He's a better running back already . Not as good in the pass game but for eleventy billion dollars less I think it'll be ok
When will they realize they need Bell to win games!
James Conner is better than Bell.
There, I said it
Traditionally this works, too. Rod Woodson is the only player I can think of off hand where it was a clear mistake letting him go. I guess you could throw Emmanuel Sanders in there too but to a lesser degree.Uh, they smacked around the Browns and won.
Pitt is one franchise that won't bow down to the demands of a player.
It wasn't 100 percent serious, but I do think Conner has to be the guy moving forward regardless of what Bell does.As a runner? Sure.
Overall? No.
But, I understand why Pitt won't bow down to him.
Uh, they smacked around the Browns and won.
Pitt is one franchise that won't bow down to the demands of a player.
Traditionally this works, too. Rod Woodson is the only player I can think of off hand where it was a clear mistake letting him go. I guess you could throw Emmanuel Sanders in there too but to a lesser degree.
Reminds me of the Mike Wallace situation where they got roasted for not paying him (they ended up giving Brown the contract they offered to Wallace) and we all saw how that worked out.
I can’t agree with a post more than this one.As a runner? Sure.
Overall? No.
But, I understand why Pitt won't bow down to him.
Uh, they smacked around the Browns and won.
Pitt is one franchise that won't bow down to the demands of a player.
You do realize he was being a smart ass right?