- Thread starter
- #1
I think we all knew his elbow was giving him a lot more problems than he was admitting. I understand gutting it out to be there with your team, but if you're hurt enough to where you're a liability to your team on the field and at the plate, it sucks, but you've gotta speak up.
Perhaps he did and it went ignored because they were hoping his hitting would come around
I don't think so. I'm sure the coaching staff knew he wasn't 100%, but I don't think they knew how much pain he was really in.
Probably but they needed him out there regardless. Who else plays first?
Austin Riley and Francisco Cervelli both played first during the regular season. Adam Duvall has played first for us before as well, and he was one of our few hitters that bothered to show up, and he was coming off the bench. All are big downgrades from a healthy Freddie, but they're all probably better options over a Freddie who's elbow is hurting him so much he has surgery immediately after elimination.
It doesn't matter at the end of the day though. We were never gonna be a WS contender without a productive Freddie Freeman.
If you look at Freeman's game logs you can almost see where the injury probably started bothering him. Up until September 1st he was having his best season ever in terms of power and then from Sept. 2 until the end of the year he didn't hit another home run. He was probably living on reputation the rest of the way because he was still getting his walks and mixing in some hits. But by the postseason I'm guessing there is more scrutiny by other teams scouting and the Cardinals I'm sure were aware he wasn't 100% so that probably didn't help.At the same time, Riley was God awful to end the season (.132 avg, .450 OPS in September), so if he played instead of Freeman and continued to stink up the joint, the complaint would be 'why'd they play someone who at the moment is one of the worst hitters in baseball'
I guess there are still fans of his out there
Was the kid choking on halloweeen candy?
FFF
How you figure?
FFF