San Fran is not a 6 win bad team, unlike the teams the Browns played. Rams only played 2 real bad teams(4 wins or less), while the Browns played 5 games against 4 win or less teams. That is a difference.
You play who's on your schedule.
Depth = importance. Teams say the same thing every year and as players go down they cry about injuries. Third tier players were there should be 2nd tier yet a team overpaid in too many others and don't have space. Future, did you miss that part? A lot of contracts coming up that no team would be able to afford them all. The window is narrow.
You do understand how scheduling works in the NFL right? There are only two games even somewhat decided on the past season. Maybe 3 now with a 17 game schedule. I don't recall how they're picking that final game? The other 14 are predetermined between your div games, four more in your confrence on a rotating basis, four out of confrence on a rotating basis, and finally two/three from the two other divisions in your confrence you didn't play already.
You could be correct? Doubtful, but correct. The records are a large part of the equation but only a part.
So the Pats are a 7 win team?
Shhhhhh, let him go unless you want to hear how far the mighty Lambs had to travel thus thier 1-3 record.
Dipshit, I'm just talking about who they played last year, that's it. All I basically said is the AFC North had the easiest opponents last year, which is true. Of course, it is not like that every year. Stop assuming shit
Your just mad, your Pats got their ass kicked and still can't get over it. I'm also sorry the GOAT don't play for you any more.
No assumption Billy Bad Ass.
NE had a terrible year no doubt. Said it many of times here. It happens. You as a Lamb fan should know that.
Watch out Battlelyon running around throwing out his, poop, boring and clown stickers. He does this when he has nothing to back up his nonesense.
I didn't vote. That could've swayed the entire board. I didn't like either choice but the arguement has been made. Also I made the point of what really defines the best? Sometimes the eye test is wrong.All I know is out of 27 votes the NFC West got 24 and the AFC North got 3. Sounds like the board over whelming feel the NFC West is best.
Are we talking about the same AZ team. Who had 3 wins tree years ago? Two of those wins were in the div, 5 wins the year after and 8 last season? In a div where they fair pretty damn well against the likes of Seattle about 50/50 wirhout looking it up. Not sure that's going to get it done?
