- Thread starter
- #1
CrashDavisSports
Well-Known Member
Just asking, because not much has been discussed lately.
Would take that draft in a heartbeat.I am onboard with that. To me, ideally this would be the bomb if our draft fell this way. Now granted, I am more a surface guy looking in, and do not have all the in depth analysis the Bengals do on these guys. Been very happy with them lately in the draft. 2020's draft may have been the greatest draft in Bengals history. One draft like that changes an entire organization.
#31 - Kaiir Elam, CB
#63 - Alec Pierce, WR
#95 - Greg Dulcich, TE
#136 - Cam Jurgens, C
#174 - Matt Araiza, P
#209 - Hassan Haskins, RB
#226 - Michael Clemons, DE
#252 - Kaylon Barnes, CB
Agreed. Only down side is that for some positions/backup needs - you may need to "reach" just a little...a guy who may not be worthy of the 63rd pick in the 2nd round might be a consideration just because of how the board breaks knowing he won't be there with the next pick at 95...It's also a bit harder because in some of the areas of needs for backup, this draft is really light. There aren't too many DT's I really like at the 3-tech (though I think the kid from UConn, despite being a NT, might develop into a monster 3-tech next to Reader - but again, he's not worth the 31st pick, and will be long gone by 63).This picking at the very end of the draft deal is a good one.... Feels good knowing our roster isn't dependent upon a rookie making an immediate impact. If I had my preference, I hope they take the best defensive player available. Corner, safety, d-line... Anything to build on that side of the ball. We definitely need more corners for next year, but I have a sense they may be in the veteran late FA market as we get closer to camp.
I guess it all depends on who falls. If we have a good player sitting there with our pick, I think we will just pull the trigger and not worry about an extra pick later. Possibly could trade back from the bottom of the second into the third and pick up and extra 4th.Agreed. Only down side is that for some positions/backup needs - you may need to "reach" just a little...a guy who may not be worthy of the 63rd pick in the 2nd round might be a consideration just because of how the board breaks knowing he won't be there with the next pick at 95...It's also a bit harder because in some of the areas of needs for backup, this draft is really light. There aren't too many DT's I really like at the 3-tech (though I think the kid from UConn, despite being a NT, might develop into a monster 3-tech next to Reader - but again, he's not worth the 31st pick, and will be long gone by 63).
I could see the Bengals trying to trade down either in the 1st or 2nd rounds, depending on who is there of course, and picking up an extra 3rd or 4th rounder to try and take advantage of some of that depth for IOL and opening up more room in the other rounds to target more pressing needs for this year/next year at CB, S, LB
I wouldn't be shocked to see them drop from 31 into the 2nd round. If there is a run on QB's or something, or only 1/2 left from that top group - you could see a team really wanting to get back into the 1st round and ensure that not only do they get their guy, but they get him with a 5th year option.I guess it all depends on who falls. If we have a good player sitting there with our pick, I think we will just pull the trigger and not worry about an extra pick later. Possibly could trade back from the bottom of the second into the third and pick up and extra 4th.
I wouldn't be shocked, but I would if one of the players they are targeting is there and them missing out on him to just try to attain another pick. I am not saying we will not do it, because I think it is a viable option, but I don't think it will happen to just get another pick. They are doing it to get another pick because none of their guys are available with their pick.I wouldn't be shocked to see them drop from 31 into the 2nd round. If there is a run on QB's or something, or only 1/2 left from that top group - you could see a team really wanting to get back into the 1st round and ensure that not only do they get their guy, but they get him with a 5th year option.
Could pick up an additional 3rd+ and still end up with a solid player at multiple positions.
Correct. I didn't mean trade down just to trade down....if there is a guy they really like, then yes you take that guy. But, I've been running through the PFF simulator again since they updated the ratings, and to be honest - I'm not overly thrilled with how that has turned out the majority of the time.I wouldn't be shocked, but I would if one of the players they are targeting is there and them missing out on him to just try to attain another pick. I am not saying we will not do it, because I think it is a viable option, but I don't think it will happen to just get another pick. They are doing it to get another pick because none of their guys are available with their pick.
This is my issue when I have messed around with the PFF simulator.... I'm mostly tempted to trade down. The issue with trading down is that we really don't need 10 draft picks. There is likely only going to be roster space for 5 or 6 rookies at most.... And the guys that don't make it need to clear waivers, so it doesn't do you any good to catch some real talent that you can't keep around. On the other hand, this is the type of draft that would be pretty cool to have multiple 3rd or 4th round picks. Lots of guys that seem like they have lots of promise and lots of question marks.... I'd rather increase my odds on one of them hitting by taking extra.Correct. I didn't mean trade down just to trade down....if there is a guy they really like, then yes you take that guy. But, I've been running through the PFF simulator again since they updated the ratings, and to be honest - I'm not overly thrilled with how that has turned out the majority of the time.
Most of the time you end up with a few guys who are good, but not really (IMO) worth the 31st pick - if you end up with 4-5 guys all grouped together - then you can risk a bit of a drop 5-7 spots, pick up that extra pick and likely still have 2-3 of those guys still around, or you get a bit closer to where some other guys are more accurately rated.
Again - Elam is there - I'm taking Elam 100% of the time. No trade. But, I've run through quite a few where the next best guy is a DE, and not that they can't always use another rush guy - but not likely at 31....
Would love Sauce as a Bengal, but the amount of picks required to move up that far would be too much.How bout a trade up with carolina and grab us some 'sauce'. They need picks
Elam is my #1 guy. If he's there, I think he should be the pick, hands down. He would fill an immediate need (Let's face it, we do not want Apple starting for a full year again, just not sold on him) and immediately brings depth.