- Thread starter
- #1
Draft position wise it's much better than Pittsburgh, but they would have to make that 2023 pick a 2nd in order to tempt me.MSN
www.msn.com
I like the trade, but dont like the picks in the 3rd and on.
Draft position wise it's much better than Pittsburgh, but they would have to make that 2023 pick a 2nd in order to tempt me.
I absolutely don't like your Pittsburgh proposal. It sucked from a drafting position this year because it makes us weaker as a team. Given the choices, I'll take trading with the Saints 10 out of 10 times over the Pittsburgh deal.Of course you dont like that deal
I absolutely don't like your Pittsburgh proposal. It sucked from a drafting position this year because it makes us weaker as a team. Given the choices, I'll take trading with the Saints 10 out of 10 times over the Pittsburgh deal.
I still think that the Saints proposal shortchanges us next year.
C'mon man the price of everything is going up, not down! By your reasoning, trade value should still be what it was when they were wearing leather helmets!Its what the Bears gave the Giants last year.
C'mon man the price of everything is going up, not down! By your reasoning, trade value should still be what it was when they were wearing leather helmets!
Correct and the price has gone up over last year, you know this!
they wont take it if a difference maker is there at 11IF that is the only offer at the time, I think they will take it
they wont take it if a difference maker is there at 11
several options , gardner , hamilton wilson among othersWho is the difference maker? Hamilton? Wilson?