What in the fuck does that have to do with him being better than Amos or not?You called Dix a bargain signing in a previous post. Just own it.
Dix has been let go by two teams and is more of a band-aid for Chicago.Amos is the better all-around player. You never really saw him, which was good and bad. Bad in that he's not making a lot of flashy plays, from coming up to make tackles to INTs to crazy PDs. Good in that he was almost always in the right position to take away throws and help coming up on a runner.
With the Bears' front 7 that dominated against the run and can get after the passer, Dix's ball skills and athleticism might prove more valuable if it turns out significantly more turnovers. Or, the Bears could really miss Amos' ability to be where he needs to be so there's less throwing and running lanes through the backend of the defense.
The Bears lost the better safety in Amos.
No shit. Look at their prices, and get back to me at the and of the year.
As have previously stated, Amos is a better tackler and more durable, while Dix is more athletic and has better ball skills.
Get fucked.
Clinton-Dix turned down bigger offers for 1-year deal and chance to win Super Bowl with Bears | Pro Football WeeklyDix has been let go by two teams and is more of a band-aid for Chicago.
beardown thinks Dix is better...
Each and every year that they have played in the league together, Dix has had more tackles and more INTs than Amos. Numbers never tell the whole story, but what it does tell me is I'm quite satisfied in having HaHa man the other safety spot for the Bears this season.