Search results

Oh man. No love for UCLA?

Why isn't Purdue shooting a 3 on every possession?

You knew that Hunter Strickland was hated when Posey didn't move a muscle when Harper was going after Strickland. LOL.

When I read an article about this trade, I had to reread the name of the guy we got to make sure that it wasn't Hunter Strickland.

I never even heard of the Coronet before.

Damn, how did I never know about this? That is unbelievable.

And now they're reviewing something again. LOL.

College basketball is so bad. So they can review everything else, but they can't review a foul call when it was clearly a good blocked shot?

When we had Bonds, I remembered thinking that 90 wins was disappointing considering that fact that we had the greatest player in the game. Obviously, I always expected too much when I was young. I'm never going to fully get over 2002.

No losing records yet. We're all homers!

I'd like to think that there will be a real investigation and that it will find that Ohtani did nothing wrong, but yeah, I can totally see MLB investigating this in way that gives all benefits of the doubt to Othani.

It's probably the homer in me, but I think the roster is pretty good. I'll say 88 wins. Man, I remember being a kid and always expecting 100 wins before the start of each season because we had Bonds and because our young pitchers would rise from the minor leagues to become greats (Foppert...

Truly well-deserved. The guy might be the second most valuable Chief.

I hope you're right because the Eagles are one of the best teams in the NFL and they will stand in the way of any team that wants to win the Super Bowl. Barkley is a monster and he is a truly special talent.

The three point contest was the best thing. It's weird to have players who aren't currently in the NBA in the dunk contest, but I get it. Many NBA players don't do the dunk contest anymore.

No way I can get that without looking it up. LOL.

I guess Curry broke basketball. Also, the game is what it is. It's an exhibition game. I rarely watched it before and I almost never watch it now.

Apples to oranges. The All Star Game is very different from other games. It's taken less seriously than a preseason game. Much less seriously.

College basketball is a terrible product. It's basically watching each team run down the shot clock and then watching someone throw up a low percentage shot.

There are no guarantees or absolutes in sports. Every game, every series is different. Even if one player or one team is better than the other, it won't be a win every single time.

Mychal Thompson has a good idea. Instead of a game, make it an All Star Dinner. Fans can listen to the players talking about basketball and whatever, and we get to watch them eat. Maybe have the players go to the host city's best restaurant chain, who will also be the All Star Dinner sponsor.

At least the NBA All Star Game is better than the Pro Bowl.

I'm not so sure about the scoring and shooting part. LeBron has a higher TS%. Also, the NBA has more talent now, so it's a tougher league to dominate.

Yup, that's exactly what I was thinking about. Size matters. LeBron holds up in the paint better than MJ.

I just feel he was the bigger factor overall. A one man team went to the Finals (2007) because the one man was LeBron. He is the better passer, better rebounder, equal or better defender, and the bigger body. And he is way ahead on three point shooting.