I have lost all focus on what the original argument was as I've been drinking and it is almost 4 in the morning. So we will leave it here. Like I said, I wish for the continued success of the Washington program, as long as it does not come at the expense of my own teams. Wipe the floor with...
Ok, I understand when the schedule was made that not much was available. But you have to look at it from an outsiders perspective. It looks weak. No matter what site you go to, no matter what source you use, Washington has the weakest SOS in the top 10.
They weren't on the rise when the schedule was made. Rutgers hit their peak and was a couple seasons removed from being ranked when they were scheduled. They were sloping down. The team now can't control who was scheduled years ago, but we can't all pretend that Rutgers and Idaho were good tests...
He had them at 9-4, not 9-3, while going 3-4 in the Big East, with exciting wins over Howard, FIU, and Texas Southern. Yea, they were a team to be feared when they made that schedule.
And since you want to toss me some cake instead of answer the question, here is a quote from the Idaho football team wiki that says all that needs to be said.
"In 2015, the Vandals improved to a 4-8 record."
just to give a frame of reference, over 46,000 tickets were sold to the MAC Championship game tonight. The PAC 12 championship between Oregon and Arizona in 2014 (which had much higher attendance levels than tonight) had 45,618. Hell of a conference