Search results

So I guess this gets Michigan off the hook now for their bowl game?

You f’ing tagged him and you’re calling him out for responding? Some might consider that a bitch move.

Honestly I expected to be dodging empty beer bottles with that one.

It helps you feel better when you haven’t won shit in 30 years :noidea:

My bold Championship prediction: The Tigers will win it all.

Really the only two worth mentioning since the playoffs started

Finally a good semifinal game.

Great news. At least one weapon will be back for Book.

At full speed I never thought he had possession

I think you have him confused with this guy oh. And my dad never liked you.

when my dad was a coach he used to say you gave to put your opponent away so the refs CAN’T take it from you. if a game comes down to any one call that means you didn’t do your jobs.

I know that. It’s the first half. When the foul occurs in the second half they have to sit out the first half of the next game. I DO NOT like that rule.

:scratch: Wut? That’s certainly one way to spin it. The rule itself serves a valuable purpose but they should be as clear as possible on what constitutes a violation. And a player should only miss the game in which it occurs. You want to punish a team to discourage it it should be in the...

he didn’t lead with his head and the only reason there was helmet to helmet contact was because Lawrence initiated it.

Can we please stop with the “by the rule book” nonsense It was a terrible call. that said, the PI that followed it was not, the poor tackling and trading FG’s for TD’s were not the fault of that call.

#54 should feel terrible. He was trailing the play and if he breaks down then he would have cleaned up the play.

Except that other one was obvious targeting. This, not so much.

Because the ACC is shit.

Um. I don’t think so.

Shaping up to be another semi-final barn burner :rolleyes2:

So they just going to play with a running clock in the second half?

Well, first time in a looong time they’ve posted back to back to back 10+ win seasons and there the kind of consistency you need to recruit to the next level. Overall I was impressed with the bowl win. It was a complete game against a highly motivated opponent. They had every reason to mail it...

Well said @78Cyclones :suds:

I’m posting in one of the other ones. I just came to give my :2cents:

Well we’ll see what they do coming out of the half. ISU gets the ball to start. Stat wise it’s pretty even. The two turnovers were costly.