Search results

Yeah for sure.

That's silliness

Lawrence was amazing the second half of the year.

Which is exactly why we shouldnt of drafted him. We should of fixed the line. I didnt circle back yesterday, my fault. Hope you know I was goofing around.:suds:

A Well there in lies my point. We had so many other needs. Build your foundation before taking a luxury pick. I hope it was just najees foot last year(it likely was), but hes been a wasted pick thus far. His rookkie year was nothing but volume. So strongly disagree. Defense did that. Najee...

Yes. And he still was not good. Last yeah his foot may have ben an issue. Regardless. We could of drafted a lineman. We should of drafted a lineman. He has been mediocre at beet. Warren in limited action has been more effective. But soooo glad we drafted najee .

U can get a 3 down back later. Zero need for najee when they did, and he has not been good at all

We all said that, then we took heath miller. We also took najee. So take that fwiw.

Mahomea won year two.

Godfather

Im familiar with him. I want to see it first. Theres always early hype. If everyone thought he was sproles part 2, he would of gone higher.....just saying

we all kept telling you guys @FaCe-LeE-uS but noooooo we were idiots.

dallas was for a while. They could of been. They had the line. Thats how the eagles can do what they are currently doing. Get the great line and decent backs. Dallas had great line and very good back for years....

Over st brown and even a godwin. Nope.

you really are on your high horse anymore arent you? Wish we all could be so wise.

Sorry djax is someone ill rail on any chance i get. .

Did he? Go route extraordinaire. 75% of His receiving totals generally came in like 3-4 games a year. Guy was very overrated.

man him and brown just arent built the same for those routes. Browns a monster. Id just like him to fill in so he doesnt snap in half. Yes he's held up well. But the odds are forever not in his favor, not even close at his current size. Very few players survive that size. Its possible..

ok I was trying to be a little bit of a smart ass. However, yes post injury smith came on, pre-injury despite his targets(targets do not = production) goedert was the more productive option. Can we agree on that? FWIW Smith has shown for now he can withstand the beating. I had said prior to his...

Dear god :L. Corrected.

My apologies on fulgham. My intent was to state that in the past he had alot of targets, but that doesnt mean hes a productive or efficient option. I also stated up to goederts injur in my comments, Yet thats not what you are discussing. We are going to spin in circles here. I can tell. My...

yeah, we can see your're spinning this a bit. The point is fulgham had alot of targets too. Targets dont always equal production. A top 10 wr getting more targets, having less yards, and less yac than your tight end.....hey thats fine.

K. Well with fewer targets. Goedert had more receiving yards 6 of 8 games that they both played and finished to start the season.fulgham had alot of targets too. Could be off there Maybe someone didnt finish a game before week 9

He did. Doesnt mean his stats were great. He went off without goedert

Yep n check Smiths numbers before goedert got hurt