Search results

He said Cavs in post 5 years LeBron would be better than Heat post 5 years LeBron.

They are 16-1 favorites, yet some argue the team down 0-3 is the team to beat because they were higher seed.

His end result was same as my prediction, but he thought the Heat would be totally overmatched and said healthy Pacers probably beat Heat. I’ve said all along that Heat can give any team a tough series. Were talking Wiggy. The person who claims Riley and Butler are washed up.

Nobody stated or debated that a series is over until a team wins 4 games. Team up 3-0, is the team to beat every time any team is in that position.

I picked Heat to lose, but that has nothing to do with who is the team to beat in the series as of today.

Bucks were never champion of anything other then best regular season record which means nothing, today.

None of that means anything as of today, because they are down 0-3 in this series. If a golfer enters a tournament as the #1 rated player, but is 12 strokes back after 3 rounds, he is no longer the player to beat in that tournament.

You can keep saying it, and keep being wrong IMO. No team, ever, down 0-3 in a current series, is the team to beat. The Bucks being the #1 seed means exactly what, as of today? You gave the Heat a 97% chance to win. You are saying the team you are almost certain will lose is the team to...

I Two different things isn't a technicality. Yes they were EC champs until they didn't even make the playoffs. They were never in the same sentence as 'team to beat' once LeBron left. This isn't that hard. The team up 3-0 in a currently being played series is the team to beat 100% of the...

So when the Cavs lost LeBron and TT said Cavs were still the team to beat, you thought that it made sense? It's one thing to still call the current champs the current champs, even though you know it's only until the next season ends. That's far different than saying the current champs are the...

So you are saying the exact same mindset you applied when Bucks were down 0-1 should be the same as when they are down 0-3? You know that makes no sense. You're just being stubborn.

Miami Heat -1600 324 Milwaukee Bucks +900 @tlance Current Vegas odds on series. I think the team that is a 16-1 favorite is the team to beat.

No way. There is no logical argument to say that a team you just predicted had a 97% chance to lose is the team to beat. Never in NBA history has a team come back from down 0-3. The team with the best season regular recored earns HC advantage throughout the playoffs, which often times is a huge...

I agree with this post, but it directly counters you saying a Bucks team down 3-0 is still the team to beat.

So the team which you just gave a 97% chance to lose is still the team to beat? That makes absolutely no sense. All the Bucks are as of this moment is a 1 seed who is down 3-0 to a team who has looked better than them throughout, and although I'm sure the Heat still respects them, they...

So finally they aren't the team to beat IYO? :yahoo:

Assuming we don't lose 4 in a row, there is no doubt in my mind that the winner of the Boston/Toronto series will be a much tougher opponent than what we've seen from Bubble Bucks.

I highly doubt that he'll be thinking about if/when he decides it's time to move on.

Mayfield > Mahomes #onlyWiggy Mayfield> LeBron

Lonely at the top of this mountain.

Well, Bledsoe missed game 1. He can default to that.

I picked the Bucks in 6, just because. But, I felt much better about the Heats chances once @WiggyRuss weighed in.

Heat will do the same thing to him as they did LeBron.

It would have been lovely to see him out there if we were up or down 20 in garbage time. He was put in right after we came back the first time to take a lead. Within literally 2 minutes we were down 6-7, from him getting beat.