ehb5
HTTR
Just a quick backtrack to judging Cam by his no Super Bowls wins, and just how many other QB's don't have one..I thought, wth, I'll take a deeper look.
Firstly, let's get rid of anyone who hasn't been in the league at least 5 seasons, I mean honestly, its unrealistic to judge a QB as a total winner or not when hes still getting his feet wet on his rookie contract. And let's eliminate everyone who isnt expected to be thier team's starter. That leaves us with 13-14 QB's..the 14th being wether you assume Foles is the Bears starter or not. This gives us a much better apples to apples comparison group. I don't think its quite fair to bunch Tua, Burrows, Murray, Daniels..etc..into the same group as Cam and just say "well 25 other QB's haven't one one either", when almost 20 of them really aren't expected to be in that position yet, and Cam has ten years of opportunities over them.
Matt Ryan, lost SB
Brady, won SB
A. Rodgers, won a SB
RW, won a SB
Cousins, no SB's
Brees, won SB
Stafford, no SB
Trannyhill, no SB
Bridgewater, no SB
Big Ben, won SB
Tyrod, no SB
Rivers, no SB,
Cam, lost SB
Foles, won SB
So out of 14 starting caliber QB's, who've been in the league long enough to realistically expect them to have won one, 6 have. Of the other 8, I think its a fair assessment to say that only Ryan, Rivers, and Cam, MAYBE Stafford, could be viewed through an unbiased lenses as "winners". And Rivers has the same issues that Cam does.
So yes, I think its very fair to call out Cam as to wether or not he's won anything. Most of his "winning" contemporaries have.
It's probably worth pointing out that looking at QBs as 'winners' or 'not winners' is silly in the first place.
Let's worry about good QBs vs not good QBs. There are way too many other factors involved in being a 'winner'. I mean is anybody really gonna argue for dilfer over Marino?