tomcat1
Well-Known Member
i addressed this myth in another thread , take a look at it
As you posted previously, bless Dean's heart because I still don't think he understands.
i addressed this myth in another thread , take a look at it
As you posted previously, bless Dean's heart because I still don't think he understands.
no you dont or else you wouldnt make that statement . 67% of the worst to firsts fail and go back to awful . i want a perennial contender not half ass one year wonder BSI understand that quick turnarounds are possible. Im not saying Super Bowls but a playoff appearance would do wonders for this franchise.
no you dont or else you wouldnt make that statement . 67% of the worst to firsts fail and go back to awful . i want a perennial contender not half ass one year wonder BS
Again not based on actual data . Read my thread. Worst to first . The data there refutes your claimconsidering our history, a playoff birth speaks volumes to this franchise. The RG3 playoff year was a very exciting time for this franchise. If we are picking top 10 once every 4 years it wouldn't bother me. The way the NFL is setup right now is the league discourages dynasties and wants new teams in the Super bowl every year.
Again not based on actual data . Read my thread. Worst to first . The data there refutes your claim
no you dont or else you wouldnt make that statement . 67% of the worst to firsts fail and go back to awful . i want a perennial contender not half ass one year wonder BS
because i would like to have some super bowls to talk about instead of accepting crapYes that data means a potential Super Bowl contender every year. What's wrong with a playoff appearance once every 3 or 4 years?
because i would like to have some super bowls to talk about instead of accepting crap
And let’s do that by building a long term winner and not the hit and miss crap we have had here lately ( 20 yrs )Sure, but lets start small like winning a playoff game.
I would love to back to a Gibbs like era or even something like the George Allen era where you felt you had a chance every year. I don't want to be Debbie Downer but I don't see that happening as long as Snyder is the owner. At my age I would take one great season and be happy. I keep thinking even a blind squirrel has to find a nut once in a while.
This guy didn't have the balls to make a prediction. JD 50/50 is hilarious b/c he is going to be our 3rd down back. My top four would be Guice and Gibson as the power runners and JD and Barber as the 3rd down backs. If you classify Gibson as the 5th Wr then you make Love the 4th Rb. There is no need to have Peterson on this team. Just doesn't fit what we want to do now or in the future of this team.
Coach Dean, you seem to have it all figured out on who our 3rd down back will be even though we haven't even had one team practice yet.
gibson was a college wr he can easily be the 3rd down back , and your right 50/50 is laughable its more like 10/90This guy didn't have the balls to make a prediction. JD 50/50 is hilarious b/c he is going to be our 3rd down back. My top four would be Guice and Gibson as the power runners and JD and Barber as the 3rd down backs. If you classify Gibson as the 5th Wr then you make Love the 4th Rb. There is no need to have Peterson on this team. Just doesn't fit what we want to do now or in the future of this team.
gibson was a college wr he can easily be the 3rd down back , and your right 50/50 is laughable its more like 10/90This guy didn't have the balls to make a prediction. JD 50/50 is hilarious b/c he is going to be our 3rd down back. My top four would be Guice and Gibson as the power runners and JD and Barber as the 3rd down backs. If you classify Gibson as the 5th Wr then you make Love the 4th Rb. There is no need to have Peterson on this team. Just doesn't fit what we want to do now or in the future of this team.
gibson was a college wr he can easily be the 3rd down back , and your right 50/50 is laughable its more like 10/90
gibson was a college wr he can easily be the 3rd down back , and your right 50/50 is laughable its more like 10/90