Markieff, another clown joins the circus.

CitySushi said:

I’ve quoted so many things in this thread that you have been wrong about.

You’re like someone who’s color blind trying to tell us what the sky looks like.

Click to expand...

Shaqdaddy11 said:

Find me a source that Paul George was a serious target for the Bucks.

Just one

Click to expand...

buckalis said:

Yes... I actually was wrong in one thing... I thought (like most experts in the media) that the Bucks would keep Brogdon and would look to sign and trade Middleton because the return would be larger... Didn't count or knew what the coaching staff and the F.O. already knew...

That being:

"The Bucks had already a better alternative than Brogdon they were counting upon on Donte Divinincenzo and had planned a program to have him fully ready until this season's playoffs come up... Therefore after Indy was prepared to pay a beyond expectations salary on Brogdon, they got the best return they could for him and preferred to keep Middleton instead!"

i guess it's such a big fault of mine to your eyes that makes me a basketball ignorant... doesn't it?

I guess it's exactly the reason why I think you are a moron if you insist of bringing up posts of mine suggesting solutions the Bucks could have considered if they would have part with Middleton, but you deliberately "hide" or "forget" the Middleton departure part that I mention in the same conversation...

Click to expand...

CitySushi said:

I don’t believe you are a moron. I believe you are unrealistic if your perception of value and you always believing you’re right. I give you props though on admitting you were wrong. I don’t believe I know everything about basketball and can be wrong as well. It’s part of learning.

Click to expand...

buckalis said:

Still my suggestion for PG had nothing unrealistic about it... OKC would achieve it's main goal (which was to save 20M of salaries), would have kept Grant, would have gotten a useful role payer on Snell, would have renewed Hill on a team friendly deal and would have added a huge future potential asset on Donte and a few picks (a 1st among them)...

It's no way better than what they got back for PG from the Clippers, but again, what they got back from the Clips is absolutely insane and they definitely won the deal as it proves from the results...

Click to expand...

buckalis said:

R U?

Click to expand...

trojanfan12 said:

It's always Ouzo thirty somewhere.

Click to expand...

buckalis said:

I never said PG to the Bucks, I said that "if the Bucks won't resign Middleton last season, they would look for a replacement on their No2 on the team" and because I was the only one that predicted OKC will blow it up, I suggested that this could be PG...

Then that troll called T-Lance who had spend 8 pages on the same thread using all shorts of BS trying to prove me wrong in my reasoning behind my claim that "OKC will blow it up" and will want to save 20M of salaries, had his pride damaged and decided to divert my suggestion (which included me saying that if PG wouldn't work, there are more alternatives the Bucks would look for in order to replace Middleton) in me "being insisting" that "the Bucks will surely trade Snell (as main piece - which he never was in my suggestion) for PG"...

Only as a reminder, my suggestion was that Hill would be tempting for the OKC to buy his contract on a "sign and trade" because he only had 1M guaranteed but his previous value was 19M thus would save them a fortune, Snell could be a useful piece as a salary filler and then a young asset on a rookie contract (DDV) + some picks could do it...

Click to expand...

buckalis said:

But... I don't deny saying what Sushi quotes... it's true!

It's only that the thread was created by 322 in a continuation of another 8 pages of "conversation" with T-Lance and 322 where a million other things have been said... including: Middleton signing or not, OKC blowing it up or not and what a possible trade would look like in detail... Snell and Hill are only mentioned there out of the proposal because the rest included in the proposal before are of insignificant salary to consider...

Click to expand...

buckalis said:

No... what you did in purpose, was to cut out the part "if Middledon will not resign..." and then also the part saying "PG or Aaron Gordon or other similar"... (forward that can play the 3).

Did you or did you not? it's exactly this which proves you a moron!

Click to expand...

tlance said:

And you were wrong on 99% of what you said.

Click to expand...

buckalis said:

Still my suggestion for PG had nothing unrealistic about it... OKC would achieve it's main goal (which was to save 20M of salaries), would have kept Grant, would have gotten a useful role payer on Snell, would have renewed Hill on a team friendly deal and would have added a huge future potential asset on Donte and a few picks (a 1st among them)...

It's no way better than what they got back for PG from the Clippers, but again, what they got back from the Clips is absolutely insane and they definitely won the deal as it proves from the results...

Click to expand...

tlance said:

Yeah, I am a troll:

OK buddy.

how you coming on finding those quotes?

No luck?

Wonder why.

Click to expand...

tlance said:

LOL.

Here you go again. Tripling down on stupidity.

What they got back from the Clips is fair value for a player coming off a near MVP caliber season. Which is why your idea was so wildly unrealistic. OKC would need to get a package like what they got from the Clips to entertain moving PG. They were never going to move him just to dump salary. He had too much value for that.

Click to expand...

buckalis said:

Watch your fucking mouth moron... you know what my reaction can be if you start like that... don't you?

Now on subject... You've said just before that a deal which would include Hill, Snell, Divincenzo, a 1st and a couple of 2nds for Paul George is "triple down on stupidity"... didn't you?

I have a few simple questions for you...

-How much idiocy do you eat for breakfast,
-How many times did your mother told you not to confuse sperm with milk when you drink "white" liquid with your breakfast and finally...
-why do you use an umbrella whenever God is raining brains on you?

Click to expand...

ChiefsLakers67 said:

ooooo, watch out, coach. he's coming for you...!!!


View attachment 233698
are you ready...?

Click to expand...

buckalis said:

Why you call him "coach"? is he coaching trolls on web, or is he a double account of yours?

Click to expand...

ChiefsLakers67 said:

of COURSE it's an alt. Thought you knew...

Click to expand...