If that's the way you see this, you are not very smart indeed. I know you hate Boise, and for years any topic of them was sure to have you jump in with ignorant/smart ass comment, but you can't be this ignorant. We all know better.
Bwaha. Again with the childish shots, eh...
Going independent is a viable option for them. I think this is more of a contractual specific performance action, but it will be interesting to see how it plays out...
BYU is a religious school that won't play on Sundays. Boise St. doesn't offer enough undergrad degrees in order to meet the PAC requirements.
That's what I'm saying, the PAC needs to wise up and drop that nonsense. Get em while the gettin is good.
Not gonna happen. The PAC will never take BYU. Boise State is a possibility once they grow some more...
What? Boise State has more undergraduate degrees than a few of the PAC schools. That has nothing to do with it. It's about TV sets, and research programs.
Every member of the MWC were all once part of the WAC so....Bwaha. Again with the childish shots, eh...
The MWC is clearly better than the WAC and a football person of like yourself knows that. But again, your hate puts a smile on my face every time, Boy.
My point stands, Boise leaving is awful for the MW.
I'm sure you have a point somewhere, but I don't know what it is.
calling a the Mountain West WAC 2.0 is accurate considering all the schools came from the WACI'm sure you have a point somewhere, but I don't know what it is.
ASU, Arizona, Rice, TCU, were too. But that has nothing to do with him bringing up the WAC. He was doing it as a pot-shot.
Anywho, when you figure out what your point was, send it my way.
If you choose to see it that way, that is fine. However, the shot is being placed as if it (MWC) was the same as the WAC in it's last days. When U of I, New Mexico St., and others were in it.
