LHG
Former Californian. Hesitant Tennessean.
FZ heard our complaint and has made a move. Now we have a mediocre reliever with two plus pitches but poor control.Extremely. This sucks
FZ heard our complaint and has made a move. Now we have a mediocre reliever with two plus pitches but poor control.Extremely. This sucks
You like poor defense in right field that much? Besides, this plays more to his strength (no pun intended), although it is yet to be known how offense will change at the ballpark formerly known as SBC Park.Hmmm. I would have liked this for the G's
You like poor defense in right field that much? Besides, this plays more to his strength (no pun intended), although it is yet to be known how offense will change at the ballpark formerly known as SBC Park.
Fuck him. Fuck him up the ass. Fuck him up the ass with a giant 12 inch dildo. Fuck him up the ass with a giant 12 inch dildo with razor blades attached.
Interesting. Maybe that 26 man roster was the precursor. I cannot imagine how cal will feel about this.At $16m per year, I could live with it. Plus, if this is to be believed:
I didn't realize he can opt-out after the 1st year, so that's not ideal. Although if he did that, he could be extended a QO and they could have gotten another draft pick out of him if he walked. Oh well.
Are the Giants really thinking about playing this guy instead of Dubon?
Pretty easy to imagine actuallyInteresting. Maybe that 26 man roster was the precursor. I cannot imagine how cal will feel about this.
I don't think a QO can be given to a player opting out of a contract. I could be wrong, though.
That, to me, is annoying. Dubon's bat and Sanchez' bat should make that the opposite, especially on a team of "hitters" like this one.It appears that they may use Dubon as a super utility player. Sanchez is a legit defensive talent, though his hitting is less than inspiring.
Yeah, my post was very much tongue in cheek. I had already seen cal's response when I wrote that.Pretty easy to imagine actually
I apologize if my post was vague. I will try to be more concise in the future.Yeah, my post was very much tongue in cheek. I had already seen cal's response when I wrote that.
I apologize if my post was vague. I will try to be more concise in the future.