How long does Philly stick with Wentz before going back to Foles?

fordman84 · Apr 18, 2019

PhoenixEagles1 said:
It’s not homerish conjecture at all and he played all 16 year one. Why do you have to be like the drones on here and pretend he’s not a fantastic player bro.

Because his body of work doesn't show him to be fantastic. His numbers and his performance on the field are on par with an average QB.

fordman84 · Apr 18, 2019

DallasSucks said:
Well, granted I’m not a regular, but it looks like some of you doubt he’s playing Week 1, so I figure I’d just add my one cent.

I’ll also say he plays the whole year too which seems many of you don’t think as well.

No one is talking about next season, we are talking about last offseason...meaning game 1 of this last season.

dbldwn711 · Apr 18, 2019

DallasSucks said:
Well, granted I’m not a regular, but it looks like some of you doubt he’s playing Week 1, so I figure I’d just add my one cent.

I’ll also say he plays the whole year too which seems many of you don’t think as well.

The reference to “week one” was last year. Only one person (PE1) felt that there was a chance he would play week one last year. As you know he didn’t.

Welcome to the gig.

DallasSucks · Apr 18, 2019

dbldwn711 said:
The reference to “week one” was last year. Only one person (PE1) felt that there was a chance he would play week one last year. As you know he didn’t.

Welcome to the gig.

I see. Well, can’t speak for PE. Pretty much most people figured he’d at least sit out the first couple of games. I really though he was gonna sit out the first four and I still think that was the plan. I just think they panicked because Nick Foles turned into Nick Foles the early part of the season and rushed him back.

eaglesnut · Apr 18, 2019

Manster7588 said:
So are you saying Game day reports were inaccurate?

Nope.
Pay attention if you're going to ask me questions.

dbldwn711 · Apr 18, 2019

DallasSucks said:
I see. Well, can’t speak for PE. Pretty much most people figured he’d at least sit out the first couple of games. I really though he was gonna sit out the first four and I still think that was the plan. I just think they panicked because Nick Foles turned into Nick Foles the early part of the season and rushed him back.

I take it by your comments that you’re not a Nick Foles fan. Is that right?

eaglesnut · Apr 18, 2019

fordman84 said:
I don't need ten more sources, just one in the first place that actually shows the injury reports would do just fine. Not some idiot on Disney blathering on or some free media writer washing Luries nuts.

You know, provide a source...like I did.

Is it the phrase "limited participation" that is hanging you up?
Let me know if I should define that for you...

DallasSucks · Apr 18, 2019

dbldwn711 said:
I take it by your comments that you’re not a Nick Foles fan. Is that right?

No, I’m a fan. The guy won a SB and I’ll be forever grateful for that. He’s also a genuine good guy and easy to root for in life.

But as a franchise QB, he is extremely 50/50 and more limited and lower floor than others.

dbldwn711 · Apr 18, 2019

DallasSucks said:
No, I’m a fan. The guy won a SB and I’ll be forever grateful for that. He’s also a genuine good guy and easy to root for in life.

But as a franchise QB, he is extremely 50/50 and more limited and lower floor than others.

What do you think Wentz has done in his career that you can point to that makes you think “yup... that’s the guy we need rather than Foles”?

(Obviously I put that in quotes and you didn’t say it. I’m just paraphrasing what it appears you are saying).

mrschaney · Apr 18, 2019

No doubt that Wentz is a good qb, but can he stay healthy?

DallasSucks · Apr 18, 2019

dbldwn711 said:
What do you think Wentz has done in his career that you can point to that makes you think “yup... that’s the guy we need rather than Foles”?

(Obviously I put that in quotes and you didn’t say it. I’m just paraphrasing what it appears you are saying).

A) Nick’s never had a year like Carson had in 2017. Even last year with a broken back Carson still rated highest in the division and played better than I think people want to give him credit for.

B)Physical tool’s, Carson has the better arm, accuracy, anticipation, mobility (though certainly hope to see a more conservative ginger this year in that regard) and allows for a more wide open playbook. Nick is much more predictable.

C)Consistency, like I said, Nick is streaky and has high ceilings and low floors. However his ceiling is lower than Carson’s as is his Floor. Carson is more reliable in his play (granted, not so much his health right now)

Now, I’m not saying give Wentz the big money contract right now, but I prefer going with him and seeing what his full potential is, than sticking with Nick where I’m wondering Week to week whether we get Good Nick or Bad Nick.

dbldwn711 · Apr 18, 2019

DallasSucks said:
A) Nick’s never had a year like Carson had in 2017. Even last year with a broken back Carson still rated highest in the division and played better than I think people want to give him credit for.

B)Physical tool’s, Carson has the better arm, accuracy, anticipation, mobility (though certainly hope to see a more conservative ginger this year in that regard) and allows for a more wide open playbook. Nick is much more predictable.

C)Consistency, like I said, Nick is streaky and has high ceilings and low floors. However his ceiling is lower than Carson’s as is his Floor. Carson is more reliable in his play (granted, not so much his health right now)

Now, I’m not saying give Wentz the big money contract right now, but I prefer going with him and seeing what his full potential is, than sticking with Nick where I’m wondering Week to week whether we get Good Nick or Bad Nick.

I think the knocks you mentioned about Nick aren’t fair. He’s had terrible coaches including jeff fisher. Wentz’ “best year” wasn’t even a year AND it’s a team that won the SB without him.

Foles has proven he can run Pedersons offense every bit as good as wentz can (even better some would say). All wentz has in favor is potential and that’s because he’s yet to show he can do it consistently and when it matters.

Playing QB isn’t about arm strength. Lots of guys have more arm strength than Brady but would you say they are better.

You and the other wentz fans are completely ignoring that he’s hurt. He had a bad back coming out of college and now has a reconstructed knee. If wentz can’t be mobile he can’t be effective. Nick can be effective.

I think pinning your hopes on wentz is a bigger gamble than you probably realize. I think you WANT wentz to work out more than you BELIEVE he will work out.

Manster7588 · Apr 18, 2019

eaglesnut said:
Nope.
Pay attention if you're going to ask me questions.

OK, Let me ask it this way.
Was he injured, while not being on the game day reports?

dbldwn711 · Apr 18, 2019

@Tapey said it best a long time ago... when it comes to evaluating Wentz there’s a lot of squinting, viewing stuff differently, a lot of excuses and a lot of “almosts”.

Ok... he’s going into year 4 and has yet to PLAY in a playoff game let alone win one. It’s getting harder and harder to label him a “franchise QB” with that fact.

This is the year he better get his act together and actually PERFORM.

DallasSucks · Apr 18, 2019

dbldwn711 said:
I think the knocks you mentioned about Nick aren’t fair. He’s had terrible coaches including jeff fisher. Wentz’ “best year” wasn’t even a year AND it’s a team that won the SB without him.

Foles has proven he can run Pedersons offense every bit as good as wentz can (even better some would say). All wentz has in favor is potential and that’s because he’s yet to show he can do it consistently and when it matters.

Playing QB isn’t about arm strength. Lots of guys have more arm strength than Brady but would you say they are better.

You and the other wentz fans are completely ignoring that he’s hurt. He had a bad back coming out of college and now has a reconstructed knee. If wentz can’t be mobile he can’t be effective. Nick can be effective.

I think pinning your hopes on wentz is a bigger gamble than you probably realize. I think you WANT wentz to work out more than you BELIEVE he will work out.

Disagree, Wentz has put up better numbers running Doug’s Offense, and I think it’s also unfair to discredit the work Carson put in for that team that Won the SB. Let’s remember. There wasn’t a single person that thought the Eagles were going to win the SB after Carson went down.

Doug scaled down the book for Nick due to Nick’s inconsistencies and limits and it worked in a couple of key games but it also failed as well. Certainly Nick’s has had some bad coaching, but he’s also still shown to be inconsistent even in Doug’s offense.

I’m not ignoring that he’s hurt, hence why I’m not giving him a big contract but you can’t just cast him aside out of fear of injury when he’s played as well as he had when he is healthy and as well as he has when he’s banged up.

I recognize it’s a gamble, and every fan wants it to work out. But I have seen enough the last few years to believe Carson is the better option.

If it doesn’t work out, oh well.

DallasSucks · Apr 18, 2019

dbldwn711 said:
@Tapey said it best a long time ago... when it comes to evaluating Wentz there’s a lot of squinting, viewing stuff differently, a lot of excuses and a lot of “almosts”.

Ok... he’s going into year 4 and has yet to PLAY in a playoff game let alone win one. It’s getting harder and harder to label him a “franchise QB” with that fact.

This is the year he better get his act together and actually PERFORM.[/

I don’t think that’s unfair, hence holding out on giving him a deal. But I feel more confident that he does deliver a bounce back season than say Jamies Winston or Marcus Mariota who are in similar prove it type situations.

jarntt · Apr 18, 2019

DallasSucks said:
A) Nick’s never had a year like Carson had in 2017. Even last year with a broken back Carson still rated highest in the division and played better than I think people want to give him credit for.

B)Physical tool’s, Carson has the better arm, accuracy, anticipation, mobility (though certainly hope to see a more conservative ginger this year in that regard) and allows for a more wide open playbook. Nick is much more predictable.

C)Consistency, like I said, Nick is streaky and has high ceilings and low floors. However his ceiling is lower than Carson’s as is his Floor. Carson is more reliable in his play (granted, not so much his health right now)

Now, I’m not saying give Wentz the big money contract right now, but I prefer going with him and seeing what his full potential is, than sticking with Nick where I’m wondering Week to week whether we get Good Nick or Bad Nick.

I think Wentz clearly has the better skill set and more potential but two things about "A" above. I'm not so sure Wentz's 2017 was better than Foles 2013 season. In addition, I'm not even sure that history will see Wentz's 2017 as being better than Foles 2017...he did bring home the gold

Schmoopy1000 · Apr 18, 2019

funny how people want to hang their hat on Wentz' 1 excellent year & ignore/dismiss the other two.
Then those same fans want to ignore Daks, excellent year & judge only on the other 2 years.
Bottom line is no matter what the ceiling is for the 2. Head to head in their 3 years in the league.
Dak 2 Wentz 1.

After the 2018 season
Dak 33 wins
Wentz 23 wins

Dak 1041 comps.
Wentz 923 comps

Dak 11670 yds
Wentz 10638 yds

Passing TDs
Dak 72
Wentz 70

INTs
Dak 27
Wentz 28

Rush TDs
Dak 20
Wentz 2

Fumbles
Dak 25
Wentz 32

10+ yd passes (pay attention PE1)
Dak 319
Wentz 325

20+ yd passes
Dak 75
Wentz 73

10+ rushes
Dak 45
Wentz 20

20+ Rushes
Dak 2
Wentz 3

3rd conversions (moving chains)
Dak 207
Wentz 183

4th Down conversions
Dak 13
Wentz 30

DVW rating (whatever that is)
Career
Dak 2138.3
Wentz 1816

2018
Dak 695.3
Wentz 471.1

2017
Dak 582.7
Wentz 720.2

2016
Dak 860.3
Wentz 624.7

take it for what you will.
Claim whomever you think is better.
However what shouldnt be able to be debated is they are comparable to each other.

Which way back when was the original argument. Someone had a melt down with what started with comparing Goff to Wentz & then the same guy dragged Dak into it. The more we looked into it. The more we realized. Yes they are comparable.
One tries to be a stat whore
& One wins & stays within the system. (kinda like the Eagles old back up QB)

Manster7588 · Apr 18, 2019

Schmoopy1000 said:
funny how people want to hang their hat on Wentz' 1 excellent year & ignore/dismiss the other two.
Then those same fans want to ignore Daks, excellent year & judge only on the other 2 years.
Bottom line is no matter what the ceiling is for the 2. Head to head in their 3 years in the league.
Dak 2 Wentz 1.

After the 2018 season
Dak 33 wins
Wentz 23 wins

Dak 1041 comps.
Wentz 923 comps

Dak 11670 yds
Wentz 10638 yds

Passing TDs
Dak 72
Wentz 70

INTs
Dak 27
Wentz 28

Rush TDs
Dak 20
Wentz 2

Fumbles
Dak 25
Wentz 32

10+ yd passes (pay attention PE1)
Dak 319
Wentz 325

20+ yd passes
Dak 75
Wentz 73

10+ rushes
Dak 45
Wentz 20

20+ Rushes
Dak 2
Wentz 3

3rd conversions (moving chains)
Dak 207
Wentz 183

4th Down conversions
Dak 13
Wentz 30

DVW rating (whatever that is)
Career
Dak 2138.3
Wentz 1816

2018
Dak 695.3
Wentz 471.1

2017
Dak 582.7
Wentz 720.2

2016
Dak 860.3
Wentz 624.7

take it for what you will.
Claim whomever you think is better.
However what shouldnt be able to be debated is they are comparable to each other.

Which way back when was the original argument. Someone had a melt down with what started with comparing Goff to Wentz & then the same guy dragged Dak into it. The more we looked into it. The more we realized. Yes they are comparable.
One tries to be a stat whore
& One wins & stays within the system. (kinda like the Eagles old back up QB)

Stop it, just STOP it. Wentz is Phenomenal Super Star while Dak is Mediocre.

dbldwn711 · Apr 18, 2019

Schmoopy1000 said:
funny how people want to hang their hat on Wentz' 1 excellent year & ignore/dismiss the other two.
Then those same fans want to ignore Daks, excellent year & judge only on the other 2 years.
Bottom line is no matter what the ceiling is for the 2. Head to head in their 3 years in the league.
Dak 2 Wentz 1.

After the 2018 season
Dak 33 wins
Wentz 23 wins

Dak 1041 comps.
Wentz 923 comps

Dak 11670 yds
Wentz 10638 yds

Passing TDs
Dak 72
Wentz 70

INTs
Dak 27
Wentz 28

Rush TDs
Dak 20
Wentz 2

Fumbles
Dak 25
Wentz 32

10+ yd passes (pay attention PE1)
Dak 319
Wentz 325

20+ yd passes
Dak 75
Wentz 73

10+ rushes
Dak 45
Wentz 20

20+ Rushes
Dak 2
Wentz 3

3rd conversions (moving chains)
Dak 207
Wentz 183

4th Down conversions
Dak 13
Wentz 30

DVW rating (whatever that is)
Career
Dak 2138.3
Wentz 1816

2018
Dak 695.3
Wentz 471.1

2017
Dak 582.7
Wentz 720.2

2016
Dak 860.3
Wentz 624.7

take it for what you will.
Claim whomever you think is better.
However what shouldnt be able to be debated is they are comparable to each other.

Which way back when was the original argument. Someone had a melt down with what started with comparing Goff to Wentz & then the same guy dragged Dak into it. The more we looked into it. The more we realized. Yes they are comparable.
One tries to be a stat whore
& One wins & stays within the system. (kinda like the Eagles old back up QB)

“I only argue stats when they help me... otherwise I argue potential!”

- Wentz fanboys

How long does Philly stick with Wentz before going back to Foles?

@Fordman84_Tx

@Fordman84_Tx

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

I Support Law Enforcement.

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

When all else fails, Smack em' in the Mouth!

I Support Law Enforcement.

Well-Known Member

Similar threads