up until this point they were dealing with death row inmates. they wanted a young kid that wouldn't have anyone asking about them (granted, it seems a high majority of the death row inmates were either innocent or had their reasons to feel sympathetic towards)
I understand that. But for a government black operation, how hard would it really be to find 50 other kids who “won’t be missed”. Once “the Agent” requested an abort, it should have been a no brainer.
wouldn't it have still lead in the same direction to kill said agent that is still alive, as he knew about the program? i mean there's a lot of loose ends if you want to go down that angle. they killed the investigative reporter, but not his estranged wife. left his old military friend in the house without confirming the kill, etc, etc, it can be done with most shows, i didn't think that was a thread to pick at in this scenario. i guess i'm just enjoying it for what it is. many holes, but don't care yet.
i guess we're at odds with aborting once the agent was against it. once he went off mission, he was a goner, he's sticking around because you have to keep the story a live (granted, they could kill him, but he is essentially the only person the key to the story trusts). we'll see how it plays out, for the most part, i feel everyone is on board that this whole entire study was a bad idea, but things might be in motion for that not to matter.
I think she is just the precinct captain, but I am not certain.
I never watched Wayward Pines after S1, but didn’t they do a cast reset after S1? That is essentially the same as a huge time jump.
Yeah, same here but I think you're correct. Not that it matters, but I think season 2 was essentially a different story in the same setting. This is one story set over 120 years. Judging by some of the changes I get the feeling they may do a small time jump with the same characters instead of the big one. Hope I'm wrong.
I thought it was pretty freaking stupid that they bailed on the cleanse because of the girl and wife. They are convinced they are facing an ELE, but they put it off to save some kid they don’t know and a woman who was essentially dead anyway less than a day ago.
i'm completely with you on that, i guess this is my new Zoo, but as it's not the summer and the only new show, i'm willing to give it some leeway...
This is, I think, my official new bitch show. I definitely do t like it, it I’m getting some enjoyment complaining about it...
that's a curious angle i never thought about. i guess perhaps it was phrased wrong. i enjoy shitty b movies, zoo to an extent was a crazy wild show, but they went for it every time. i don't know if i ever hate watched something, if that's what you're going for. just the addition of the word hate turns me off. there's things i've watched and loved, i knew they were shit, but i loved them for what they were. i guess there's some crossover between things but, good or bad, if i'm sticking with a show, it's good on some level (to a point..)
Yeah, but some not for a long time. Besides mentions isn't Babcock not really back in the book until the end of the first book? At this pace that would be sometime in season 9.
