JD has considered him before so why wouldn't it be reasonable to ask if he would be considered?
We'll get better play for sure. Apparently, from what I've been reading, some of the players wanted him out. But we should at least get a top ten pick. The higher the better though.
Good to see you back.
Never been that far back. Heart rendering seeing this season play out. Didn't see any heart in the Rays series. Maybe Bannister lost this team, I don't know. Been busy checking out teams with a little worse record than ours and hoping they win some. Detroit, SD, Cincy. But as Benny suggested, sure we'll start winning now and ruin that.
Saw it. Kind of a shame. When the pitching was present there was no apparent problem or was there. Will never know all of it. If communications was the problem, could have been worked out I would think.
I am not agreeing or disagreeing with anyone on Bogars but the Rangers won 13 of last 16 at the end of 2014. I also liked how he handled pitching changes after watching Wash fail at this so many times. And his track record as a minor league manager was very good.
Obviously it couldn't because from what I have read it was addressed but the problem remained.
You must be confusing me with them then. No pedestal placing by me. I just remember the team getting much better when he took over. That all might have been addition by subtraction though.
Then one would think someone didn't want it to. Not that hard to do if tried.
Sounds like it was decided a while back to make a change. With the team given to Banister, sounds as if wins and losses was not all involved.
This is what Jeff Wilson had written for the FT Star Telegram yesterday. Based on this Banister seemed not willing to change.
