Why are the Aggies ranked?

TheDayMan · Sep 19, 2018

Across The Field said:
lol, so I rank two B1G teams that are also ranked in the actual polls and you go off the deep end. Good lord. FYI - I have Wisconsin lower than both the AP and Coach's Poll, so reign it back in a bit.

If commenting on your goofy take that Wisconsin has earned some made up benefit of the doubt over the past couple years, and noticing the same trend with your posts everyone else seems to is going off the deep end, yes.

Across The Field · Sep 19, 2018

Deep Creek said:
That ain't a very high standard.

Point was, if I'm "hyping" them, then the AP and Coach's polls must both basically be run by Badgers, yeah?

Across The Field · Sep 19, 2018

TheDayMan said:
If commenting on your goofy take that Wisconsin has earned some made up benefit of the doubt over the past couple years, and noticing the same trend with your posts everyone else seems to is going off the deep end, yes.

I ranked michigan at 11. That's the only homer thing I've done on here this year. I balanced it out by ranking Wisconsin lower than the AP/Coaches. You OK now?

Deep Creek · Sep 19, 2018

Across The Field said:
Point was, if I'm "hyping" them, then the AP and Coach's polls must both basically be run by Badgers, yeah?

Nah, they are run by a "herd" mentality via reputation. That is greater than any badger influence.

Across The Field · Sep 19, 2018

Deep Creek said:
Nah, they are run by a "herd" mentality via reputation. That is greater than any badger influence.

Does that exist?

TheDayMan · Sep 19, 2018

Across The Field said:
I ranked michigan at 11. That's the only homer thing I've done on here this year. I balanced it out by ranking Wisconsin lower than the AP/Coaches. You OK now?

I would be if I cared about where you ranked teams. It’s your comments that are stupid.

Deep Creek · Sep 19, 2018

Across The Field said:
I ranked michigan at 11. That's the only homer thing I've done on here this year. I balanced it out by ranking Wisconsin lower than the AP/Coaches. You OK now?

You just lost your bucknut homer card.

Deep Creek · Sep 19, 2018

Across The Field said:
Does that exist?

Only among

Across The Field · Sep 19, 2018

TheDayMan said:
I would be if I cared about where you ranked teams. It’s your comments that are stupid.

So you're not OK now?

ericd7633 · Sep 19, 2018

Across The Field said:
I'll give them credit for at least being 2-1 against 3 P5 opponents thusfar. To be fair, that's better than the majority of what the top 25 has done to this point.

Having a quarter of those yards on 1 carry had something to do with that. Again, acting like everything you know about Wisconsin for the past decade is completely null because of one bad game is foolish, and you know that.

I will be shocked if ND is rolled by VT. In fact, I see the opposite as more likely.

Wisconsin is a consistent program no doubt. But it appears this is probably the worst defense they will have in quite some time. It's tough to compare them to teams of the past because of that.

rmilia1 · Sep 19, 2018

All the worry about ranking Wisconsin will be over by about 11 PM Saturday night guys so dont concern yourself with it even a little

THUNDER · Sep 19, 2018

ckhokie said:
Quality loss is a thing for the SEC

Pretty fuckin funny comin from a VT fan.........

Across The Field · Sep 19, 2018

ericd7633 said:
Wisconsin is a consistent program no doubt. But it appears this is probably the worst defense they will have in quite some time. It's tough to compare them to teams of the past because of that.

And nothing supports that, but OK.

4down20 · Sep 19, 2018

Because they are a top25 team and should be ranked.

I started ranking them week before last. Sumlin is gone, they look like a much more physical team and they were able to hang with a "big boy" team in Clemson. In fact, they got screwed on that game.

So how the fuck can people rank Clemson in the top5 and then think Texas A&M isn't a top25 team? That's some idiotic shit right there.

ericd7633 · Sep 19, 2018

Across The Field said:
And nothing supports that, but OK.

I mean sure there is plenty if you want to be objective. They returned only 4 starters from last year to start. They've already had a significant injury on defense. They are currently 64th in the country in defensive efficiency, and the previous low for them since 2010 is 48th in 2011, which is a long time ago, as I said.

7Samurai13 · Sep 19, 2018

Across The Field said:
And nothing supports that, but OK.

Who needs facts when you can just use biased opinion?

THUNDER · Sep 19, 2018

TexasExes98 said:
Not trolling, just asking. I didn’t know you get put in the top 25 for barely losing.

To justify that shitty overrated Clemson team being at 2 or 3.

Across The Field · Sep 19, 2018

ericd7633 said:
I mean sure there is plenty if you want to be objective. They returned only 4 starters from last year to start. They've already had a significant injury on defense. They are currently 64th in the country in defensive efficiency, and the previous low for them since 2010 is 48th in 2011, which is a long time ago, as I said.

3 games in. In the first two, they allowed like 250 yards and an average of 8.5 ppg. They're well-coached and routinely cycle players in an out. I will be surprised if they are anywhere near 64th by season's end.

Across The Field · Sep 19, 2018

7Samurai13 said:
Who needs facts when you can just use biased opinion?

?

BigRedMoe · Sep 19, 2018

Scapegoat said:
View attachment 187226

Denton does have a certain charm to it.

Why are the Aggies ranked?

Day Butt Ass the sadgaydayboy

Oaky Afterbirth

Oaky Afterbirth

Well-Known Member

Oaky Afterbirth

Day Butt Ass the sadgaydayboy

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Oaky Afterbirth

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Oaky Afterbirth

Quit checking me out.

Well-Known Member

Funniest SH member

Well-Known Member

Oaky Afterbirth

Oaky Afterbirth

Highly Polished Member

Similar threads