Laker fans.....this is not a troll question or statement.
I"m looking at all this activity.....I see nobody wants to play for my Mavs. What I want to know is have you guys figured out that nobody wants to play with Kobe? We're in the same boat.
What I can't figure out is WHY. Dallas has a great market, great city, great owner, great facilities, and a recent title.....LA has legacy, great city, ownership that's willing to pay, and is basketball ROYALTY. Yet nobody is willing to sign with either team.
On the Mavs, I have no clue. I have never understood why the Mavs can't seem to land a top FA. Dallas is great city and while it may not have quite the nightlife of places like L.A., NY or Miami, it has plenty to offer in that regard. Plus, I'm not sure there's a more player friendly owner than Cuban. Dirk has also indicated that he'd take a backseat to another top FA. I truly have no clue on that.
As for the Lakers, I don't think playing with Kobe has much, if anything, to do with it. Dwight is Dwight and he pulled even worse crap in Orlando than he did in L.A. Word is that his leaving had nothing to do with Kobe and was about the Lakers sticking with D'Antoni. Also, Dwight just never seemed comfortable with how bright the spotlight is in L.A., so that may have weighed into his decision as well.
Lebron wasn't coming to L.A., his agent listened, but it was always going to be Miami or Cleveland.
The Lakers weren't even on the radar for 'Melo when FA began and managed to move to the point that for a few days, they were the top threat to the Knicks. Much of that was because of Kobe, not in spite of him.
So in each case, it was more about opportunities to win now and/or make more money (remember, the Lakers could offer him the most of anyone and it was still $30 million less than the Knicks) than anything to do with Kobe.