SLY
Mr. Knowitall
Throw Quebec in Conference C and Hartford in Conference D. We'll be good to go. Or just get rid of Phoenix and Columbus.
Throw Quebec in Conference C and Hartford in Conference D. We'll be good to go. Or just get rid of Phoenix and Columbus.
They should stick with 4 Divisions, but they should have an equal amount of teams in each Conference. Make it so that the top two teams from each Division is guaranteed a playoff spot and then the next best 4 teams (regardless of division) make it in. Move Columbus or Nashville to the East (sorry Detroit fans).
We have it easy?
It's already hard as hell to make it into the Western Conference playoffs.....well, it just got harder as they've added one more team to contend with.![]()
Travel is still shitty for WC teams. Oh well. I fucking LOATHE how easy the Atlantic Division has it.
Hell yeah, your teams (especially those around New York) get to sleep in your own beds for 75% of the season.
I know a lot of you guys out East don't think that travel takes a toll, but it does.
We have it easy?
You would have to add two teams, or get rid of two teams then.
I'm assuming you mean in terms of travel? Yeah...but keep in mind most teams are going to actually travel MORE now with so many more games out of conference. Schedule maker has their work cut out for them.
No, they don't.
I love the current Conference names, is this a sports league or a Marriott hotel?!?
"We'll meet in Conference room A to hash things out."
To have 4 conferences and have all the same amount of teams, yes, yes you do.
You didn't read my post. I said have four Divisions.
Only 2 Conferences, each with 15 teams.
This just occurred to me. We often complain about the fact that the "Bettman point" (the point awarded to the loser in OT/SO games) makes games less exciting because teams have an incentive to play more conservatively just to get to overtime, where "everybody wins." However, so far, one force that keeps this in check is the fact that teams play within the conference 64 out of 82 games, and nobody wants to hand out extra points to rivals in their conference. And we have all observed the "who cares" attitude that takes over when playing out-of-conference games (i.e. it doesn't matter if we give away extra points to out-of-conference teams, because it doesn't affect our own playoff race).
But starting next year, out-of-conference games go from 18 to 44 (46 in the 7 team conferences). And games within the conference go from 64 to 38 (36 in the 7 team conferences).
This means that, instead of 18 out of 82 games with the "who cares" attitude, we'll be looking at 44 of them. Forty-four games in which there will be a strong incentive to play conservative, dull, prevent-defense hockey.
Get rid of the Bettman point. It's bad now, and it's about to be twice as bad. Or, 44/18ths as bad, to be exact. (My suggestion for how to do that is still the best in my humble opinion, but of course no one will ever do it.)
Anyone complaining about travel is just... looking for excuses why their teams cant hang.
That's not even close to logical.