Edisto_Tiger
Member Sporting a Natty
hold on ....Wonder what this one looks like
hold on ....Wonder what this one looks like
Did they beat anyone that had land?There seems to be a flaw in your system. After Army gave up its early conquests, it went out and put together 9 more wins. Where are those on your map?
There seems to be a flaw in your system. After Army gave up its early conquests, it went out and put together 9 more wins. Where are those on your map?
There seems to be a flaw in your system. After Army gave up its early conquests, it went out and put together 9 more wins. Where are those on your map?
A flaw, you mean like only one?
Yes, they did. Eastern Michigan had wins over Toledo & Ball St.; Toledo had a win vs Bowling Green; Ball St. had a win vs Eastern Michigan;Did they beat anyone that had land?
Maybe more than one, but that's the one that stood out.
Yes, they did. Eastern Michigan had wins over Toledo & Ball St.; Toledo had a win vs Bowling Green; Ball St. had a win vs Eastern Michigan;
Army also beat Miami of Ohio, which had beaten Akron & Kent St; and the Cadets had a win over Buffalo, which had conquered Rutgers, Temple & Eastern Michigan.
I'm guessing you don't factor in FCS teams, so I didn't look up Army's wins vs Lafayette or Colgate; or Buffalo's victory vs Delaware St.
Oh, were they all undefeated?
Amazing how something so simple goes way the fuck over so many posters heads.
When two teams that currently have no land play a game and one of them wins, how much land do they each still have?
Were they supposed to be?
So team A starts off with their own land... (amazing we have to go to this level)Were they supposed to be?