• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

POLL which team is better

Which team is better right now

  • browns

    Votes: 33 51.6%
  • dolphins

    Votes: 31 48.4%

  • Total voters
    64
  • Poll closed .

DirtDirtDirt

Well-Known Member
31,892
5,215
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Browns


No more directionless franchise in the game than Miami

That's what happens when Mike Tannenbaum is calling the shots

Desperately needed a QB and could have made a move for Allen or Rosen

Lose Landry, replace him with dime a dozen guys like Albert Wilson and Amendola. Sign Frank Gore

Just a total mess

I'll take the Cleveland talent and potential all day every day
 

Clayton

Well-Known Member
36,333
9,898
533
Joined
May 17, 2012
Hoopla Cash
$ 9,000.59
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
The Dolphins future is a mess. They have the Safety position locked down and thats about it. If Tannehill is healthy then I think he'll keep them out of the top pick (someone's QB will get hurt and that team will get the #1 pick) but if Tannehill is banged up or can't play then Miami has the worst roster in the league, imo.

A healthy Robert Quinn is probably worth a couple of wins next year.
 

rmilia1

Well-Known Member
44,428
10,422
1,033
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Location
iowa
Hoopla Cash
$ 86,060.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Cleveland . They'd be light years better if they hadn't bungled the draft so badly
 

YankeeRebel

Well-Known Member
15,479
8,591
533
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,800.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I voted Pats > Steelers cause honestly who gives a fuck about the other two?
 

rmilia1

Well-Known Member
44,428
10,422
1,033
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Location
iowa
Hoopla Cash
$ 86,060.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Lol, you Barkley stans are wild.
Browns had 2 picks in the top 4 and didn't get the best offensive OR best defensive player in the draft . They stretched for a QB and then drafted a guy at 4 they could've got at 8-10 If they'd traded back
 

Fountain City Blues

Love Everybody
45,254
12,685
1,033
Joined
Jul 2, 2013
Location
The Gates of Hell
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.36
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Browns had 2 picks in the top 4 and didn't get the best offensive OR best defensive player in the draft . They stretched for a QB and then drafted a guy at 4 they could've got at 8-10 If they'd traded back
They drafted QB1 and arguably CB1, and maybe RB2 or 3. Stop it.
 

YankeeRebel

Well-Known Member
15,479
8,591
533
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,800.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Browns had 2 picks in the top 4 and didn't get the best offensive OR best defensive player in the draft . They stretched for a QB and then drafted a guy at 4 they could've got at 8-10 If they'd traded back
Absolutely
 

rmilia1

Well-Known Member
44,428
10,422
1,033
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Location
iowa
Hoopla Cash
$ 86,060.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
They drafted QB1 and arguably CB1, and maybe RB2 or 3. Stop it.
It's not just who you get . It's where you get them. Ward is fine but why pick him at 4 when you can trade back, get him 5 picks later and add another pick ? Their draft would have been ok if you didn't know they had 2 of the top 4 picks. When you've pick 1 and 4 and you don't get a top 5 player you had a bad draft
 

DirtDirtDirt

Well-Known Member
31,892
5,215
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Browns had 2 picks in the top 4 and didn't get the best offensive OR best defensive player in the draft . They stretched for a QB and then drafted a guy at 4 they could've got at 8-10 If they'd traded back


I thought pairing Chubb with Garrett was the no brainer of the draft
 

rmilia1

Well-Known Member
44,428
10,422
1,033
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Location
iowa
Hoopla Cash
$ 86,060.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I thought pairing Chubb with Garrett was the no brainer of the draft
Cleveland drafted for need which is what 10-6 teams do , it's not what 0-16 teams do
 

jarntt

Well-Known Member
33,880
12,242
1,033
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Browns had 2 picks in the top 4 and didn't get the best offensive OR best defensive player in the draft . They stretched for a QB and then drafted a guy at 4 they could've got at 8-10 If they'd traded back
Why because mocks said so?
 

rmilia1

Well-Known Member
44,428
10,422
1,033
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Location
iowa
Hoopla Cash
$ 86,060.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Why because mocks said so?
Because no one behind them was taking Ward with tge other guys still on the board ?? Lol. Denver was the only other team so worst case you trade back one spot, take ward at 5 and add another pick . And Denver was trading out of 5 until Chubb became available so clearly they didn't like Ward much
 

YankeeRebel

Well-Known Member
15,479
8,591
533
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,800.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I thought pairing Chubb with Garrett was the no brainer of the draft

Agreed 100% then The Browns still could have grabbed the DB of their choice and landed a better QB in RD2 then they did with the #1 overall pick.
 

jarntt

Well-Known Member
33,880
12,242
1,033
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Because no one behind them was taking Ward with tge other guys still on the board ?? Lol. Denver was the only other team so worst case you trade back one spot, take ward at 5 and add another pick . And Denver was trading out of 5 until Chubb became available so clearly they didn't like Ward much
How in the World could you possibly know that? the internet???
 

rmilia1

Well-Known Member
44,428
10,422
1,033
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Location
iowa
Hoopla Cash
$ 86,060.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
How in the World could you possibly know that? the internet???
You just look at who the teams behind them took . Nor too tough to discern . Tge y saud during the broadcast Denver was trading 5 til Chubb was available and the teams 6-8 weren't taking him. First real threat would've been SF at 9. Realistically he probably doesn't go til 11 and that's only if Miami liked him more than Minkah whicj is debatabls Taking him at 4 was completely unnecessary
 

jarntt

Well-Known Member
33,880
12,242
1,033
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
You just look at who the teams behind them took . Nor too tough to discern . Tge y saud during the broadcast Denver was trading 5 til Chubb was available and the teams 6-8 weren't taking him. First real threat would've been SF at 9. Realistically he probably doesn't go til 11 and that's only if Miami liked him more than Minkah whicj is debatabls Taking him at 4 was completely unnecessary
so the internet...
 

rmilia1

Well-Known Member
44,428
10,422
1,033
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Location
iowa
Hoopla Cash
$ 86,060.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
so the internet...
The teams don't draft on the internet. It already happened. The next DB off the board was at 11. Lol. It was like 2 months ago. You can probably read anout it if you want to catch up
 
Top