Very wrong
There's no rational argument to your point. Has nothing to do with bias.good thing you're not biased...
There's no rational argument to your point. Has nothing to do with bias.
Nope1 < 2
fin.
That’s literally the only reason why Ohio State was selected over Penn State in 2016.Nope
It's literally not though.That’s literally the only reason why Ohio State was selected over Penn State in 2016.
Ohio State would have a blow out loss and a loss out of conference, one of which is to a mediocre team.
Penn State would have only one loss, to the other team that kept them out of them CCG despite having a better overall record.
And how many top twenty wins did Ohio State have this year? How many top ten wins did Penn State have last year? We aren’t comparing should 2017 Penn a State go over 2016 Ohio State. It’s should 2017 Penn State go over 2017 Ohio State when they have similar resumes as did 2016 Penn State did with 2016 Ohio State.It's literally not though.
2016 OSU finished the regular season with 3 top 10 wins. PSU would have finished 2017 with one top 20 win. HUGE difference. I don't know how that seems to be so easily overlooked when this conversation comes up.
Before the bowls started, OSU had two top 10 wins and 3 top 20 wins. If Penn State had beaten Michigan State, they would've ended the season with 1 top 20 win.And how many top twenty wins did Ohio State have this year? How many top ten wins did Penn State have last year?
You are right, Ohio State is a bigger name and would bring in a lot more money played a major factor as well.Before the bowls started, OSU had two top 10 wins and 3 top 20 wins. If Penn State had beaten Michigan State, they would've ended the season with 1 top 20 win.
Last year, Penn State had 2 top 10 wins and OSU had 3. OSU had also finished top 10 on both offense and defense, while Penn State didn't.
So, again, your assertion that 2 losses vs 1 was the only reason OSU got in over PSU is wrong. Your comparison of this year to last is very misguided.
And cue the typical response of a person who knows they are wrong in this conversation. Thanks for playing.You are right, Ohio State is a bigger name and would bring in a lot more money played a major factor as well.
You can’t reason with delusional. Ohio State fans are one notch below Michigan fans I. That category. Remember when most of you were arguing how you should be ranked higher than Oklahoma after they dismantled you this season. Of course you blocked that out. You are also ignoring how the committee went out of their way to include you once before.And cue the typical response of a person who knows they are wrong in this conversation. Thanks for playing.
LOL you can't refute a single thing I said about the Penn State - Ohio State debate so you change the subject. Exactly as I figured you would. You can't possibly refute a single thing without resorting to the "Oh well OSU bring in more money" BS argument. Also, how did the committee "go out of their way" to include us before? Fucking stupid, baseless arguments galore from you.You can’t reason with delusional. Ohio State fans are one notch below Michigan fans I. That category. Remember when most of you were arguing how you should be ranked higher than Oklahoma after they dismantled you this season. Of course you blocked that out. You are also ignoring how the committee went out of their way to include you once before.
I did refute it and you went full 8 year old sticking your fingers in you ears screaming “I’m not listening”. You know, your default setting.LOL you can't refute a single thing I said about the Penn State - Ohio State debate so you change the subject. Exactly as I figured you would. You can't possibly refute a single thing without resorting to the "Oh well OSU bring in more money" BS argument. Also, how did the committee "go out of their way" to include us before? Fucking stupid, baseless arguments galore from you.
No, I provided very clear and relevant facts and, rather than address those, you deferred to the old "well OSU brings in more money" routine because you couldn't refute what I said.I did refute it and you went full 8 year old sticking your fingers in you ears screaming “I’m not listening”. You know, your default setting.
Yes because when you close our eyes to any facts other than Ohio state would beat the New England Patriots by 58 points, it is impossible to have a discussion with you. You do it every single time someone suggests that they could beat Ohio State. We get it, you are a blind homer like 95% of the people here. Stop pretending like you are rational though. You aren’t.No, I provided very clear and relevant facts and, rather than address those, you deferred to the old "well OSU brings in more money" routine because you couldn't refute what I said.
That’s literally the only reason why Ohio State was selected over Penn State in 2016.
Ohio State would have a blow out loss and a loss out of conference, one of which is to a mediocre team.
Penn State would have only one loss, to the other team that kept them out of them CCG despite having a better overall record.
Before the bowls started, OSU had two top 10 wins and 3 top 20 wins. If Penn State had beaten Michigan State, they would've ended the season with 1 top 20 win.Yes because when you close our eyes to any facts other than Ohio state would beat the New England Patriots by 58 points, it is impossible to have a discussion with you. You do it every single time someone suggests that they could beat Ohio State. We get it, you are a blind homer like 95% of the people here. Stop pretending like you are rational though. You aren’t.