Which would give you a better chance at giving you a perfect bracket?

[pumpkinhead33793]

Knowledge in advance of every team that advances to the round of 32.

OR

Knowledge in advance of who would be in the final 4 and who would win those 3 games.

 

[Jim Rome is Flaming]

Knowledge in advance of every team that advances to the round of 32.

OR

Knowledge in advance of who would be in the final 4 and who would win those 3 games.

Round of 32. There are a lot more people that pick the final four correctly than pick the entire first round correctly.

 

[Blackshirt]

I've only done brackets for the past 10 years... I've gotten the final four entirely correct like 6-7 times. The closest I have ever gotten to getting the first round correct was missing like 1-2 games. Other than that I usually miss like 4-5 games. You can eye ball who the best 2 teams are in each region usually, some there is a clear cut who's going to make the final 4 out of that bracket.

 

[oaknightshockey1]

Round of 32. There are a lot more people that pick the final four correctly than pick the entire first round correctly.

Agreed unless it is one of those crazy years where a team like George Mason sneaks in.

 

[TrollyMcTroller]

Knowledge in advance of every team that advances to the round of 32.

OR

Knowledge in advance of who would be in the final 4 and who would win those 3 games.

So you're asking if I'd rather know the outcome of 19 games (that are generally the easiest to predict)

OR

The outcome of 32 games (that are typically the hardest to predict)

Hmmmmm... lemme thing about that one.

 

[Shanemansj13]

Knowledge in advance of every team that advances to the round of 32.

OR

Knowledge in advance of who would be in the final 4 and who would win those 3 games.

Round of 32. More games, more upsets. Still would be very very difficult