Which CFB team will be the most affected this offseason?

[Across The Field]

Iowa was better. And if being 34th is close to being ranked then yeah they were close. They are no threat to beat Michigan.

Listing those 3 teams is an extreme reach based on who the teams were last season. Michigan will win comfortably against all 3. Seriously Cincy? Lol.

Just like 5-loss Iowa wasn't a threat last year.

Listing a 9-4 team with a very talented young coach isn't an extreme reach, as they are absolutely a threat to beat michigan.

 

[rmilia1]

Iowa lost quite a few slow white guys but the good news is there's plenty more where they came from

 

[7Samurai13]

Iowa lost quite a few slow white guys but the good news is there's plenty more where they came from

Iowa is the UCLA of college football?

 

[rmilia1]

Iowa is the UCLA of college football?

Minus the past success and cool uniforms

 

[Chewbaccer]

West Georgia had more players drafted than UGA...

But the pieces in place had better make some real progress, and there's gonna be some true freshmen getting a lot of playing time.

 

[Justin Tyme]

West Georgia had more players drafted than UGA...

.

Auburn???







































...or are you talking about the Div II West Georgia Wolves

 

[Chewbaccer]

Auburn???







































...or are you talking about the Div II West Georgia Wolves

The D-II West Georgia Wolves.

They had 2 players drafted this year.

Isaiah McKenzie was the only UGA player to get drafted.

FWIW Georgia Tech's kicker was their only player drafted this year too.

 

[ericd7633]

No offense to Jim Harbaugh but Michigan is losing a ton of talented players and he has not shown that he has had the ability to reload like Urban Meyer or Nick Saban. Michigan is a huge question mark at this point. Probably wins all 3 games next year.

Yeah, Michigan will have a lot of questions. But no offense to Sparty but Michigan should win all those rather comfortably. Sparty might give them a game. I'm doubtful. But I don't see anyway Michigan doesn't beat the shit out of Minnesota and especially Cincy. I mean its absurd to think Cincy could realistically beat Michigan. Michigan will probably be favored by 25.

 

[7Samurai13]

Yeah, Michigan will have a lot of questions. But no offense to Sparty but Michigan should win all those rather comfortably. Sparty might give them a game. I'm doubtful. But I don't see anyway Michigan doesn't beat the shit out of Minnesota and especially Cincy. I mean its absurd to think Cincy could realistically beat Michigan. Michigan will probably be favored by 25.

We were complete dog shit last year and we made it a game. Again, I said Michigan should win all those games.

 

[ericd7633]

Just like 5-loss Iowa wasn't a threat last year.

Listing a 9-4 team with a very talented young coach isn't an extreme reach, as they are absolutely a threat to beat michigan.

Iowa was more of a threat than this years Minnesota team will be. Iowa was at home with an experienced team and senior QB. Minnesota lost their starting QB and best WR and the game is at Michigan. Michigan beats them by at least 2-3 TD's.

 

[ericd7633]

We were complete dog shit last year and we made it a game. Again, I said Michigan should win all those games.

I think the final score was misleading, but I guess that's just me. Plus the game will be in AA next year. That's a big difference.

 

[7Samurai13]

I think the final score was misleading, but I guess that's just me. Plus the game will be in AA next year. That's a big difference.

Kind of asked for it

 

[ericd7633]

Kind of asked for it

If you guys had Cook, Burbridge, Conklin, and Calhoun etc I'd give MSU a hell of a chance.

 

[7Samurai13]

If you guys had Cook, Burbridge, Conklin, and Calhoun etc I'd give MSU a hell of a chance.

I just meant I want to post that at every opportunity that I can. I keep agreeing that they will beat us. I said it the last two years as well.

 

[Across The Field]

Iowa was more of a threat than this years Minnesota team will be. Iowa was at home with an experienced team and senior QB. Minnesota lost their starting QB and best WR and the game is at Michigan. Michigan beats them by at least 2-3 TD's.

Maybe, maybe not. You really don't know. However, a 9-4 team bringing back a large part of their offense with a talented young head coach is definitely an upset threat against a team replacing so many pieces.

 

[Deep Creek]

West Georgia had more players drafted than UGA...

But the pieces in place had better make some real progress, and there's gonna be some true freshmen getting a lot of playing time.

Tell you how lacking the talent level has been at Texas lately. My shitty Miners had the same number of players drafted as the rusty cows did this year! At least their's was ahed of ours at #89 and #182.

 

[rmilia1]

Just like 5-loss Iowa wasn't a threat last year.

Listing a 9-4 team with a very talented young coach isn't an extreme reach, as they are absolutely a threat to beat michigan.

Iowa is always a threat to Michigan. I'm pretty sure it was like a decade since they beat us. What id like to know is when Michigan is going to be a threat to Iowa.... lol

 

[ericd7633]

Maybe, maybe not. You really don't know. However, a 9-4 team bringing back a large part of their offense with a talented young head coach is definitely an upset threat against a team replacing so many pieces.

I guess we're just gonna have to disagree. I don't really view them as much of the threat. Trust me, I'd love to be wrong and have Michigan lose.

 

[Across The Field]

I guess we're just gonna have to disagree. I don't really view them as much of the threat. Trust me, I'd love to be wrong and have Michigan lose.

Probably has to do with you being a Minnesota fan. Rather than look like a homer, it's easier to say they're no threat and if they upset them or at least play them down to the last minute, you're pleasantly surprised. If they get blown out, you were right. Win/win for you to argue with me here.

 

[ericd7633]

Probably has to do with you being a Minnesota fan. Rather than look like a homer, it's easier to say they're no threat and if they upset them or at least play them down to the last minute, you're pleasantly surprised. If they get blown out, you were right. Win/win for you to argue with me here.

I don't like Minnesota for football. Just for basketball. But because of that, I'm a little more in tune with all the football stuff because of the guys I follow on twitter for basketball purposes. With Fleck being there, theoretically the offense should improve, but their QB, whoever it is(Rhoda, Croft, Green with Croft being the most likely) won't have any game experience or very little. Plus Wolitarsky was the only threat they had at WR last year. The next leading pass catcher was their RB Smith(who's very, very good). I still expect Michigan's D-Line to be very good, which should neutralize Smith and force the QB to try and beat them. I know Michigan is breaking in a new secondary, but Minnesota just doesn't have the weapons to take advantage of it.