- Thread starter
- #1
SteelersPride
Well-Known Member
who has more of a case for national champs
you sure theres a thread with two guys really pushing for wiscyneither
agreed,Last I checked though, the criteria for being National Champs wasn't beating 3 loss teams in some secondary bowl. At least not since 1984.
If those two guys weren't Wile E. Coyote and Sylvester the Cat, I'd bite.you sure theres a thread with two guys really pushing for wiscy
Last I checked though, the criteria for being National Champs wasn't beating 3 loss teams in some secondary bowl. At least not since 1984.
I mean, we both just beat Clemson's signature wins. I'm not sure either of us are very intimidated by their schedule.
I mean, we both just beat Clemson's signature wins. I'm not sure either of us are very intimidated by their schedule.
IMO, half the SEC and B10 would have been undefeated with UCF's schedule this year. Maybe not the win against Auburn, but non playoff bowls are overrated IMO. UCF didn't deserve to be in the conversation, and neither did Wisconsin after their loss.
Its time to expand point blank imo .5 P5 conference champions.And undefeated UCF that just showed they belong,Bama and Wisconsin.Are very justifiable at large bids.This is why 4 is obviously not enoughI mean, we both just beat Clemson's signature wins. I'm not sure either of us are very intimidated by their schedule.