• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Solving the new NBA's problems

logic

Well-Known Member
3,681
1,635
173
Joined
Apr 19, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 69,974.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Or are you saying Boogie should have wasted his prime years in Sacramento before signing with the Celtics at 37?
 

Rock Strongo

My mind spits with an enormous kickback.
55,878
6,772
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
495 belt
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Could Malone have made more money signing elsewhere? Yes.
Did he sign at a discount to play for the favored defending champions? Yes.
Did he do so taking a lesser role on the team? Yes.
was he 27 and in his prime?

absolutely not.
 

SoCalWizFan

Well-Known Member
9,150
1,176
173
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
The players today make exponentially more, so taking 20 mil instead of 28 or whatever still makes you very rich. Malone and Barkley were making like 8-10 mil per year in the 80s and 90s, still great money but a lot less so take ng a discount was a much bigger deal. Shoe contracts were much less too.

Times have changed.

Great pt. The elite players are going to make tons of money regardless - on & off the court. Barring further major injury issues Cousins will get a big contract. So he signs for less money - so what? Some of the past players may not have actually had a chance of going elsewhere since they may have been more restricted to move at the time & also in those days it was considered a real negative to move to a team that wasn't in a major market.

Pointless to compare eras in this case.
 
Top