Reasons why I think the Pacers "could" win 40 games...

[DJ]

Mecca wins with the Doughboy pic. Or GIF

Or whatever the fuck you call them things.

 

[Shaqdaddy11]

lol @the internet tough guy.

No one picked a fight with you. Disagreeing with you isn't picking a fight with you.

You and bks are hilarious.

Anyone who disagree with him is a "troll" and anyone who disagrees with you is "picking a fight."

 

[DJ]

King was living with his GF and ex GF at the time of his death when he was floating in a pool.....he did something and 1 of those "women" did something, causing him to die.

Don't always think it's a great idea to be living with 2 women thinking you're having your cake and eating it too. Because, when you're dead......you eat no cake.

 

[DJ]

That last post might be the beer talking.

 

[Shaqdaddy11]

That last post might be the beer talking.

Just the last post?

 

[bksballer89]

Oladipo for 3 to put Indy up 1 over the Spurs. Wow

 

[ManuForever]

Oladipo for 3 to put Indy up 1 over the Spurs. Wow

I can't wait until Kawhi and Parker get back. smh.

 

[bksballer89]

Stat Padding Oladipo continues his good start. 23 tonight on 14 shots. Lead his shit team Pacers to a win over the Spurs.

 

[bksballer89]

Just maybe the Pacers aren't a shit team? Continues to look solid without their best player

 

[ManuForever]

Just maybe the Pacers aren't a shit team? Continues to look solid without their best player

No Kawhi, no Parker. I think that overshadows the loss of Myles Turner, lol.

 

[Hornsstampede2.0]

Stat Padding Oladipo continues his good start. 23 tonight on 14 shots. Lead his shit team Pacers to a win over the Spurs.

Despite the hot start, the SPURS are still down their MVP candidate player and Tony Parker.

I am happy with the (4-2) record.

But, the perimeter defense is a little bit weaker and SG/SF types are hurting them while Kawahi is missing.

 

[bksballer89]

No Kawhi, no Parker. I think that overshadows the loss of Myles Turner, lol.

Nah. Pacers are supposedly a shit team. Didn't have their best player. Spurs are very deep. Already beat teams like Minnesota and Toronto without those guys. Shouldn't need those guys to beat teams like indy

 

[bksballer89]

Despite the hot start, the SPURS are still down their MVP candidate player and Tony Parker.

I am happy with the (4-2) record.

But, the perimeter defense is a little bit weaker and SG/SF types are hurting them while Kawahi is missing.

Still a lame excuse when facing a team like the Pacers who were predicted to win 32 games and are without the best player. It is like the Cavs using the excuse of not having IT and Rose when the Nets beat them earlier this week even though Brooklyn didn't have Lin or Russell.

Just a really lame excuse when you're playing a team like Indy. Sorry not buying it.

 

[ManuForever]

Nah. Pacers are supposedly a shit team. Didn't have their best player. Spurs are very deep. Already beat teams like Minnesota and Toronto without those guys. Shouldn't need those guys to beat teams like indy

Shit happens. They've let guys like Wiggins, DeRozan and now Oladipo have great scoring nights even in wins. Dragic even had a great night in Miami. They might be deep, but you're not winning games shooting terribly, especially when your deep bench is even off the mark. Danny Green and Aldridge were the only ones who played decent.

 

[ManuForever]

Still a lame excuse when facing a team like the Pacers who were predicted to win 32 games and are without the best player. It is like the Cavs using the excuse of not having IT and Rose when the Nets beat them earlier this week even though Brooklyn didn't have Lin or Russell.

Just a really lame excuse when you're playing a team like Indy. Sorry not buying it.

So you're saying Kawhi doesn't make a difference? Tony Parker doesn't make a difference in this game? Come on. Be real. They win this game and Oladipo probably doesn't have such a good offensive night if Kawhi is playing.

 

[bksballer89]

Shit happens. They've let guys like Wiggins, DeRozan and now Oladipo have great scoring nights even in wins. Dragic even had a great night in Miami. They might be deep, but you're not winning games shooting terribly, especially when your deep bench is even off the mark. Danny Green and Aldridge were the only ones who played decent.

Point was the whole we're without Kawhi and Parker is a lame excuse when playing a bad team like Indy who also didn't have their best player. Spurs should be good enough even without those guys to beat this team.

Tip your hat to Indy and move on. Indy played better. Simple as that.

 

[ManuForever]

Point was the whole we're without Kawhi and Parker is a lame excuse when playing a bad team like Indy who also didn't have their best player. Spurs should be good enough even without those guys to beat this team.

Tip your hat to Indy and move on. Indy played better. Simple as that.

"Should be" but shit happens. Can't win every game.

 

[bksballer89]

So you're saying Kawhi doesn't make a difference? Tony Parker doesn't make a difference in this game? Come on. Be real. They win this game and Oladipo probably doesn't have such a good offensive night if Kawhi is playing.

He makes a difference but point is, the Spurs without Kawhi is deep enough and good enough to beat a team like Indy. Indy isn't some team expected to win 50 games. Give me a break

 

[bksballer89]

"Should be" but shit happens. Can't win every game.

Agree with that. Just give them their credit instead of doing what you're doing now. Spurs had a bad night. It happens. Trying to take credit from them by whipping out the we didn't have Leonard and Parker excuse is just poor sportsmanship and cry baby shit.

 

[ManuForever]

Agree with that. Just give them their credit instead of doing what you're doing now. Spurs had a bad night. It happens. Trying to take credit from them by whipping out the we didn't have Leonard and Parker excuse is just poor sportsmanship and cry baby shit.

Indy just had a really good night. Spurs couldn't hit water if they fell out of a boat. Oh well.