blazer prophet
Well-Known Member
That will be a tough test. Good for UW.2018 will be a better OOC schedule with Auburn and BYU and the year after that will be the home & away with Michigan.
That will be a tough test. Good for UW.2018 will be a better OOC schedule with Auburn and BYU and the year after that will be the home & away with Michigan.
USC and Stanford play a 9 game conference schedule along with playing ND every year home & away ... and ND is located in the state of Indiana and those two PAC schools are located on the west coast. FSU is how far away from UF and how many conference games does UF play in the SEC? Try 8.
Well, let's see what we have...
You start with 3 high school teams. I'm sure the scores will be run up to protect the guilty. 3-0
Then 3 PAC-12 doormats. 6-0
ASU on the road can be a tough one. 7-0
The ever talented and underperforming UCLA at home is no issue. 8-0
Oregon not there yet. 9-0
At Stanford is the ONLY big game. 9-1
Home at Utah and WSU fairly easy. 11-1
** Play USC is PAC-12 title game and lose** 11-2
USC in playoffs, so UW goes to Rose Bowl
ANOTHER year with only 1 game on the schedule. UW knows how to stack 'em now.
As a fan of a team that has played an FCS team for the past 6 seasons and has 4 more schedules for 2017-2020 your comments just illuminate how utterly delusional you are!I thought we were talking about ooc? However since the SEC plays garbage ooc, and some want to deflect to conference schedules. The sec east is the worst division on college football. So is it the garbage ooc schedule, or is it the garbage conference? Either way you lose!!!!!!
As a fan of a team that has played an FCS team for the past 6 seasons and has 4 more schedules for 2017-2020 your comments just illuminate how utterly delusional you are!
Massey Ratings - CF
Massey, has the SEC East ahead of The Big Ten East, The entire Big Ten, The PAC 12 South, and the Big Ten West.
You know how much weight that Massey carries? Squat. Four PAC South teams finished ranked with USC at #3 and Stanford at #12.SEC East had two teams ranked Both below SC and Stanford. If it wasn't for the parade of trucking schools the SEC teams all play at home their records would be even worse and more than half wouldnt be bowl eligable. Austin Peay? lol UL Lafayette? LOL. Middle Tenn? LOL
You know how much weight that Massey carries? Squat. Four PAC South teams finished ranked with USC at #3 and Stanford at #12.SEC East had two teams ranked Both below SC and Stanford. If it wasn't for the parade of trucking schools the SEC teams all play at home their records would be even worse and more than half wouldnt be bowl eligable. Austin Peay? lol UL Lafayette? LOL. Middle Tenn? LOL
When Boise State was decent, you guys screamed that it was unfair that BSU had to play at most ONE good team per year in OOC games and NO-ONE in-conference
'Once again, you come back with BS. BS #1, there were 5 PAC schools ranked, 2 from the north and 3 from the south NOT 4 from the south.
BS #2, Both conferences had 5 teams ranked. In OOC games and bowls, the 5 sec teams played 4 FCS schools while the PAC played 3 FCS schools. The 5 SEC played 16 teams that had FBS winning records vs 10 for the 5 PAC schools. The 5 SEC teams played 16 Bowl teams vs 11 for the 5 PAC teams, the 5 SEC schools and the 5 PAC schools played 11 Majors. The 5 SEC schools played 9 ranked opponents vs 5 for the 5 PAC teams. The 5 SEC schools played 7 T10 teams vs 4 for the 5 PAC schools. So much for "the parade of trucking schools", blah, blah, blah.
Just in case you want to pull your usual stupid $#!*, here are just the regular season OOC games.
In only regular season OOC games, the 5 sec teams played 4 FCS schools while the PAC played 3 FCS schools. The 5 SEC played 10 teams that had FBS winning records vs 6 for the 5 PAC schools. The 5 SEC teams played 10 Bowl teams vs 6 for the 5 PAC teams, the 5 SEC schools played 5 Majors vs 6 for the 5 PAC teams. The 5 SEC schools played 5 ranked opponents vs 2 for the 5 PAC teams. The 5 SEC schools played 4 T10 teams vs 2 for the 5 PAC schools.
STOP making crap up and look up the facts before you open your trap!
BTW, the data also proves why dissing FCS teams is foolish.
SEC 13-0-0
ACC 13-1-0
PAC-12 7-1-0
Big 12 7-1-0
Big Ten 6-2-0
That's 5 losses to FCS teams---Clearly, they aren't the pushovers you think they are.
I am Wondering if he realizes those 5 Wins = Floridas 5 Wins in 70 Years of OOC games out of State......Yes, because a 5-46 record just screams competitive.
Yes, because a 5-46 record just screams competitive.
You are showing your ignorance as usual.
You are showing your ignorance as usual.
The data was for only one year and was P5 vs all FCS teams.
P5 teams were 46-5 vs FCS last year (0.902)
From 2012-2016
P5 teams are 83-7 vs Sunbelt teams (0.922)
P5 teams are 110-11 vs CUSA teams (0.909)
P5 teams are 83-17 vs MWC teams (0.830)
P5 teams are 95-20 vs MAC teams (0.826)
P5 teams are 36-8 vs Missouri Valley teams (FCS) (0.818)
So, tell me again why playing an FCS team is worse than playing a team from some sucky FBS conferences?
5-4-1
10 games in 70 Years Out Of State OOC games.
Forced to Play FSU by the Government
REFUSE TO PLAY MIAMI
Cowards...
Yep, USC DOOMed to have losing record for EVER vs Florida since UF has the record and won't play USC and NOBODY can make them!!! Ha, Ha, Ha!!!