Packers@ Falcons- talk shit here

[rmilia1]

So serious question. Do Packers fans think you'll score 45 plus? Because that's what it's gonna take. Atlanta is absolutely 100% going to drop 40 plus. Do you guys like for real think you can score enough to win?

 

[Ojb81]

 

[Great Dayne]

Too soon for this, still mad at our D coordinator making the game look closer than it actually was.

 

[Great Dayne]

Is the over/under 100 for this game?

 

[Moab]

Is the over/under 100 for this game?

That's the posted over/under for your IQ...and under is at -180....

 

[Great Dayne]

That's the posted over/under for your IQ...and under is at 180....

FIFY

 

[Judge Fudge]

 

[Judge Fudge]

 

[Great Dayne]

Just throw at Randall and Rollins all day. That's an easy 4 TD's and 300 yards vs those two guys right there.

 

[rmilia1]

So basically we know both teams defenses are average at best. We also know Atlanta has the vastly superior offense. I'm thinking something like 41-31 Atlanta

 

[packerzrule]

So basically we know both teams defenses are average at best. We also know Atlanta has the vastly superior offense. I'm thinking something like 41-31 Atlanta

good for you

 

[rmilia1]

good for you

Well yeah it will be

 

[RP-29]

The Falcons have a very good quarterback. The Packers have a magical quarterback.

After seeing what Rodgers has pulled out of his hat just the last two games alone, I would be suppressing my smack talk if I was a fan of any team about to face him.

After watching all season how easily the Packers secondary can get picked apart by any quarterback, I as a Packer fan am suppressing my smack talk.

I fully expect this game to come down to: whoever has the ball last wins. ...again. Should be fun.

 

[LambeauLegs]

I guess all I have to say this week is it may not be good to make fun of Crosby as it may come back to bite you and the defense that held Atlanta to 33 points last time will be improved from that time.

The offense will have a bit better running game as in week 8 the Packers had no running backs with Lacy and Starks out at that time Rodgers was the rushing leader with 60 yards with Ripkowski coming in second with 34 yards, Don Jackson 10 yards and Knile Davis 4 yards. With changes made since that game and Montgomery running is at 5.9 yards per carry. and there is a better back up than Knile Davis.

It will be an interesting game and hopefully the improvements made since back in week 8 will make a big enough difference to make up 2 points to make it a 1 point win this time.

 

[rmilia1]

The Falcons have a very good quarterback. The Packers have a magical quarterback.

After seeing what Rodgers has pulled out of his hat just the last two games alone, I would be suppressing my smack talk if I was a fan of any team about to face him.

After watching all season how easily the Packers secondary can get picked apart by any quarterback, I as a Packer fan am suppressing my smack talk.

I fully expect this game to come down to: whoever has the ball last wins. ...again. Should be fun.

Eh. The way Rodgers has played the last 8 games is the way Ryan has played all 17 games. It just seems magical for Rodgers because he was just ok the first 10. I have no doubt GB will score points but the Packers D is fucked beyond fucked.

 

[rmilia1]

I guess all I have to say this week is it may not be good to make fun of Crosby as it may come back to bite you and the defense that held Atlanta to 33 points last time will be improved from that time.

The offense will have a bit better running game as in week 8 the Packers had no running backs with Lacy and Starks out at that time Rodgers was the rushing leader with 60 yards with Ripkowski coming in second with 34 yards, Don Jackson 10 yards and Knile Davis 4 yards. With changes made since that game and Montgomery running is at 5.9 yards per carry. and there is a better back up than Knile Davis.

It will be an interesting game and hopefully the improvements made since back in week 8 will make a big enough difference to make up 2 points to make it a 1 point win this time.

Because Green Bay is the only team playing better since week 8 lol

 

[rmilia1]

Let's get one thing clear here. Going into the first meeting Atlanta, not Green Bay, was the team playing poorly. The Falcons had lost 2 in a row coming in. Green Bay was coming off a blowout win. Green Bay simply got beat. Yes Rodgers is playing better now, as is Atlanta. Let's not pretend the Packers were slumping coming into the first meeting because they were not.

 

[LambeauLegs]

Because Green Bay is the only team playing better since week 8 lol

Did you have significant upgrades to your running game or secondary since week 8? I dont follow the Falcons

 

[Tainthappening]

Game is like a mirror... 2 teams with great offenses and terrible pass defenses. May need to score 40 to win the game.

Packers did not have Randall or Rollins in the 1st meeting.. however Atlanta was missing Coleman. Packers most likely without Nelson for this game.

Team that scores TDs and not settle for FGs will win the game.

 

[RP-29]

Eh. The way Rodgers has played the last 8 games is the way Ryan has played all 17 games. It just seems magical for Rodgers because he was just ok the first 10. I have no doubt GB will score points but the Packers D is fucked beyond fucked.

Yes, Ryan has been good, but he has had a lot of help this season, too. Do you honestly think Ryan would be in the MVP conversation without Coleman and Freeman running as well as they have?

That "just ok the first 10" Rodgers still had the team up against the Falcons very late in the 4th quarter. It was the Packers secondary who ...once again... couldn't shut the door.