- Thread starter
- #1
hope he makes it. One of my favorite players of all-time and an all-time great hitter. 68.3 WAR and 38.4 WAA, he compares very well to most HOFers.
I don't think David's stats are quite HOF worthy, but it's pretty difficult to assess a DH as opposed to the other positions. I don't think his batting stats are that far off from the likes of Thome/Edgar/etc, and it's hard to ignore his postseason heroics. This is a guy with a .947 OPS in 369 postseason plate appearances (more than half a season's worth). I think Edgar was unquestionably better, but I think Ortiz's HOF case is much different.
I have to say, I really like what the new management has done running this team in the short period that they have. Retiring Edgar's number being the latest, we finally have a team up top that is actually actively running the organization. Nintendo who?On a related note, the Mariners just announced that they're going to retire Edgar's #11 in August of this season. That game should sellout pretty quickly.
This isn't the same ol' Mariners. New regime, new policies, actual direction.Happy to hear 11 will be retired, but it's interesting since I believe one of the policies of the organization was that a player needed to be in the Hall. I'm glad there is some wiggle room there, at least for now. Edgar deserves both, but retiring his number is a no brainer.
Glad Edgar is getting his number retired and also glad they are doing it against the Angels, not a team that generates no buzz around the stadium.
Retiring Edgar's number is going to generate buzz no matter who they play, so I don't see the logic in having it against the Angels (from a financial/attendance standpoint). Angels are going to draw a big crowd on the road regardless (majority of their games at Safeco last year had an attendance 40K+). They could've potentially turn a 23K attendance game into a 45K attendance game as opposed to a 40K game turning into a 45K game.
Retiring Edgar's number is going to generate buzz no matter who they play, so I don't see the logic in having it against the Angels (from a financial/attendance standpoint). Angels are going to draw a big crowd on the road regardless (majority of their games at Safeco last year had an attendance 40K+). They could've potentially turn a 23K attendance game into a 45K attendance game as opposed to a 40K game turning into a 45K game.
you are right... But it is a little disrespectful to the player to also have the day vs a team that the mariners have NO history with... Like the Rays... Angels are a rival, they know people will come... and that is a good safety, how embarrassing would it be if they are not crowded that day(not saying it would happen)...