Is it time to move on from Allen and Rudolph?

[Brees#1]

He is apparently not the same receiver now and I cannot keep hanging onto Allen at the expense of others. Of course I have more expendable pieces in Cohen and Henry, but they are backup pieces to my starting backs.

Holding on to Allen kept me from getting both Coleman and Gordon off waivers and I had to choose Gordon instead.

Rudolph is up and down with Keenum. Keenum does not utilize him the way Bradford and even Bridgewater did. I feel he's not worth holding onto over getting someone like Cook or maybe Gresham, who is looking like a redzone target for Stanton. TE is a crappy position so far this year though. I have Clay as my other TE.

 

[averagejoe]

I think Gordon is being over valued for a guy whose been missing for 3 years on an offense that is terrible. Allen may be up and down, but his "up" days have to pay off more than anyone on the Browns.

As for Rudolph, rumor is Teddy may be back soon. But it's a big if. Clay may be better with a rookie QB right now.

 

[broncosmitty]

Unless you have Kelce, Gronk or Ertz you're pretty much hoping for a TE or it doesn't matter.


Rudolph has atleast 5 receptions each week since Game 4. Just hope one is a TD.

 

[Brees#1]

I think Gordon is being over valued for a guy whose been missing for 3 years on an offense that is terrible. Allen may be up and down, but his "up" days have to pay off more than anyone on the Browns.

As for Rudolph, rumor is Teddy may be back soon. But it's a big if. Clay may be better with a rookie QB right now.

Maybe but he's the better deep threat.

 

[Brees#1]

Allen will be seeing the bench this week for Maclin.