- Thread starter
- #1
Chewbaccer
Illustrious Potentate
I have absolutely no stats to back this up, just based purely on observation.
But it seems to me that appeals on checked swings are being ruled no swing at a far higher rate than in years past.
Seems like not that long ago that the vast majority of appeals were called a swing. This year it seems the overwhelming majority is being ruled no swing.
Am I crazy?
Do batters have stronger wrists now and are better able to stop their swing?
Are first and third base umpires not really paying attention and giving the benefit of the doubt to the batter?
Did the umpires get word from the commish to lean towards no swing?
Discuss
But it seems to me that appeals on checked swings are being ruled no swing at a far higher rate than in years past.
Seems like not that long ago that the vast majority of appeals were called a swing. This year it seems the overwhelming majority is being ruled no swing.
Am I crazy?
Do batters have stronger wrists now and are better able to stop their swing?
Are first and third base umpires not really paying attention and giving the benefit of the doubt to the batter?
Did the umpires get word from the commish to lean towards no swing?
Discuss