- Thread starter
- #1
Harrison has been great.
Would we rather have Long or Harrison?
Good answerCheck back Feb 5th.
In all honesty, Long did not have any real impact on the defense. He never started and was used primarily on passing downs to pressure from the edge. Long has never been a solid run stopper, but he is an excellent edge closer.
Me? I'll take Harrison.... much more talented, much higher skill level. He not only closes the door......he jams the bolt and locks it.
Where he would be production wise if he had been playing 50 snaps per game all season then waived, anybody's guess.
The strip sack was a joint effort with Van Noy with Van Noy causing the strip... but clearly I'm splitting hairs on the intent here because Harrison has been bringing it.Long or Harrison...damn...
Long was not asked to do in NE what he is doing in Philly and both player and coach admitted that. Long got that huge holding call in the SB, but didn't play many snaps before that.
Harrison has been out there a ton and had a huge strip sack on Bottles when it was needed.
I think we should be happy that we had both a different times...
That was the same season.H This has been going on since 2007 when the Pats lost their first Super Bowl to the Giants. Then again when the Giants stopped the 'Undefeated Season".
Nobody else saw it.....shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhThat was the same season.