- Thread starter
- #1
Neither.
FSU should remain #1 until they lose.
Neither.
FSU should remain #1 until they lose.
Eh... I hear ya but I hate that logic. Each season is supposed to be graded independently of each other. I think 5/6/7 games in we have seen enough to judge teams based on this year and not last.
Neither.
FSU should remain #1 until they lose.
If MSU holds on today they go to 6-0 with three wins against teams ranked in the top-ten. FSU has no wins against teams in the top-ten. Do rankings account for rankings?
Neither.
FSU should remain #1 until they lose.
In years past I would have agreed. But FSU doesn't look great and nobody wants an asterisk champion.
How will there be an 'asterisk champion' with a playoff? They're obviously in the top 4, that's really all that should matter.
Eh... I hear ya but I hate that logic. Each season is supposed to be graded independently of each other. I think 5/6/7 games in we have seen enough to judge teams based on this year and not last.
If MSU holds on today they go to 6-0 with three wins against teams ranked in the top-ten. FSU has no wins against teams in the top-ten. Do rankings account for rankings?