- Thread starter
- #1
kramer1
Sports betting savant
His take....
Not that worried at all. The Bengals had a lot more rookies and backups in there starting off than Detroit did.
But whatever. It was the first game of the preseason. I cannot remember when the Bengals had a good preseason... no matter what the season... even since I have followed them in the 1980s.
I thought there were some positives. I really liked Dalton. He came back from the pick and showed some poise back there.
The WRs showed poise as well... really liked what I saw.
I am concerned big time again with the OL. They looked horrible on pass protection... typical.
I thought there were a lot of positive runs with Benson... Benson looked strong and so did the run blocking. Against Suh and that line... it was a solid but limited performance.
The D had so many out that I think it is hard to evaluate just yet. Heck... it's the first preseason.
Wait! That's not Hobspin!...it's that idiot on the ESPN board. Someone please get his ass over here so I can cuss at him. What a retard.
Not that worried at all. The Bengals had a lot more rookies and backups in there starting off than Detroit did.
But whatever. It was the first game of the preseason. I cannot remember when the Bengals had a good preseason... no matter what the season... even since I have followed them in the 1980s.
I thought there were some positives. I really liked Dalton. He came back from the pick and showed some poise back there.
The WRs showed poise as well... really liked what I saw.
I am concerned big time again with the OL. They looked horrible on pass protection... typical.
I thought there were a lot of positive runs with Benson... Benson looked strong and so did the run blocking. Against Suh and that line... it was a solid but limited performance.
The D had so many out that I think it is hard to evaluate just yet. Heck... it's the first preseason.
Wait! That's not Hobspin!...it's that idiot on the ESPN board. Someone please get his ass over here so I can cuss at him. What a retard.