.. But it's even more unusual that the press hasn't pushed at this point to ask what the heck is going on...like they have been specifically told behind the scenes not to drill into it...if so that would be disappointing..always thought Casazza had the sack to stir things up...or maybe they do know and its not good news and they do not want to disrupt a great season and will write about it after the Baylor game..
Amazes me (though it shouldn't ) that his 200th isn't getting more attention from the media. Guess wading through the playoff committee BS is far more riveting to them...
Sorry, I see it a little different. I agree it doesn't do much good with the committee that already has a mindset. However, I believe it shows his team, and fans that he is willing to stand up and fight for them. He held his tongue until the regular season was over, and that shows restraint. He did not say anything different than most of us have said and thought, when you have 3 loss teams, and even a 4 loss Auburn team ranked above us.
In the end it is name, nothing else, WVU does not have the name that makes TV sets tune in. "They" have claimed a conference championship means a LOT, but they will put OSU in the playoff, even though they didn't even win they half of the B11. If anyone has a gripe it is Western Michigan, they have won them all, and don't even get a sniff of the big ring. WVU was on the big stage twice this year, and looked like bumbling stooges both times, our season was measured by that first half against Oklahoma by most in the media, and by the committee, had we not turned over the ball so many times gifting OKST such a cushion, we would be top 10 easily. The B12 is WAY down this year, and SOS counts as well to these guys, only WVU and Baylor didn't lose OOC, and only four teams are above .500, The system is what it is, quit bitching, the whole purpose of the Bowl Alliance, Bowl Coalition, BCS, and "playoff" are to give the pundits the power to exclude the non name teams, they could never let 1984 happen again.
