Always nice to relive that moment.
The loss of Ariza and Luc widens the gap between them and the Warriors.Not necessarily.
If Houston still had the same roster, I'd agree. But they got worse, especially on defense, and the Lakers would have the best player on the floor.
We also don't know what CP3 has left, but we know he's likely to get hurt at some point.
Not saying it wouldn't be a fairly sizable upset if the Lakers beat them, but it's not crazy to say they could.
The loss of Ariza and Luc widens the gap between them and the Warriors.
It only closes the gap some for teams like the Raptors and Celtics.
Maybe the 76ers.
If the Bazemore trade goes thru, that helps the defense that the Rockets lost a wee bit.
Chris Paul being injured is always a possibility.
But, that's really the Lakers only hope for beating them in a 7 game series as both teams are currently constructed.
I don't see how the Lakers can keep up offensively.
I could be wrong. But, I think the Lakers will look a lot like the Bucks....
Otherworldly Generational player, surrounded by young or middling talent.
Obviously, as good as he is, Giannis is no Bron.
But, he plays in the East and the Lakers have to run the gauntlet in the West.
So, maybe last year's Pelicans is a better example.
I would be shocked.Pretty much agree except for the bold. If the Rockets got worse and the Lakers got better...by definition, it closes the gap between them.
I agree that beating the Rockets in a 7 game series is unlikely, but not as unlikely as it would have been if the Rockets had kept the same roster.
The Lakers should be pretty good defensively and able to switch a lot on the perimeter. The main thing would be slowing Harden. The Lakers can throw several different players at him to change the looks.
He'll get his points, but if they can make him get them inefficiently, that will help their chances.
As for the offense, we don't know what they will be like offensively. How much, for example do Ingram, Kuzma, Ball and Hart all improve? How much does Lebron's presence on the court help with the quality of looks they get?
I certainly don't think they will be winning any shootouts with the Rockets, but if they can play well enough on defense, they won't have to.
Again, don't see them beating the Rockets, but I wouldn't be all that shocked if they did.
My reason for believing that the Lakers can win between 45 and 50 games is because I think there are enough pitiful teams to accomplish that goal. The Lakers have to play each team in the Eastern Conference two times - that should be good for 20 wins give or take - then beating the poor teams in the Western Conference, but the main reason will be Being able to close out games and avoiding injuries. The Lakers lost a lot of games last year because of injuries, but I am going to remain cautious and say it's a possibility. We haven't seen them play even one game yet.im telling you bruh, im so fucking excited, i know whats up, the Lakers will win 50 games in the west, bank it
I was in total agreement until he added that one word MINIMUM. The Lakers haven't played one game yet. They need to learn to play together and develop some chemistry - We have to what happens first. After the Lakers have played about 25 games - I will be less cautious with my hopesNo it isn't. I actually have the Lakers winning about 50 games this year. Saying that is the minimum they will win seems a little bold.
Inimical has been on a tear for a little while.
Lakers Exit Interviews 2018: Brandon Ingram Advises Lonzo Ball To 'Work On His Body' - Lakers NationPretty much agree except for the bold. If the Rockets got worse and the Lakers got better...by definition, it closes the gap between them.
I agree that beating the Rockets in a 7 game series is unlikely, but not as unlikely as it would have been if the Rockets had kept the same roster.
The Lakers should be pretty good defensively and able to switch a lot on the perimeter. The main thing would be slowing Harden. The Lakers can throw several different players at him to change the looks.
He'll get his points, but if they can make him get them inefficiently, that will help their chances.
As for the offense, we don't know what they will be like offensively. How much, for example do Ingram, Kuzma, Ball and Hart all improve? How much does Lebron's presence on the court help with the quality of looks they get?
I certainly don't think they will be winning any shootouts with the Rockets, but if they can play well enough on defense, they won't have to.
Again, don't see them beating the Rockets, but I wouldn't be all that shocked if they did.
Rockets were 42-3 when Capela, CP3 and Harden all played.
Capela would easily the Lakers 2nd best playerThe loss of Ariza and Luc widens the gap between them and the Warriors.
It only closes the gap some for teams like the Raptors and Celtics.
Maybe the 76ers.
If the Bazemore trade goes thru, that helps the defense that the Rockets lost a wee bit.
Chris Paul being injured is always a possibility.
But, that's really the Lakers only hope for beating them in a 7 game series as both teams are currently constructed.
I don't see how the Lakers can keep up offensively.
I could be wrong. But, I think the Lakers will look a lot like the Bucks....
Otherworldly Generational player, surrounded by young or middling talent.
Obviously, as good as he is, Giannis is no Bron.
But, he plays in the East and the Lakers have to run the gauntlet in the West.
So, maybe last year's Pelicans is a better example.
id say it really doesnt matter how many games they play together as long as they are all together during the playoffs. But we shall see.Sure, but it doesn't make much sense to project they will play more games than that together this year. CP3 is an injury magnet. Will the supporting cast be able to step as well (or better) this year?
id say it really doesnt matter how many games they play together as long as they are all together during the playoffs. But we shall see.
The Rockets top 5 players are obviously Harden, CP3, Capela, Gordon, Tucker. Ariza was arguably what? somewhere between their 4th and 6th best player last year? He will be a loss but certainly not one that is a "major loss" like a Capela would have been.
At least, at this stage in their careers- just looking at this season- id think Capela would DEF. and Gordon would probably be the 2nd best player on the Lakers. The Lakers just matchup terrible against the Rockets. The lack of interior defense on the Lakers is astounding. Harden and CP3 will have a field day getting into the middle of that defense. The Lakers have no one besides LeBron that could guard Capela on the block.
I'd maybe give them 1 game just because of the LeBron factor, but if the Lakers play them and get 2 games, considering all the young guys they are relying on who have never even played meaningful regular season games, let alone playoff games, 2 games would be a great accomplishment.
Oh I believe the Lakers will win real close to 50 games and go to the WCFsYou have LeBron.
If you dont win at least 45 games (as long as LeBron remains healthy) every person that is even tangentially connected to the organizaiton should be fired and never allowed to work for a basketball team- whether its NBA, International, G-League, LaVar Ball's bullshit league, the league Whiteside played on in Serbia, etc. ever again.