- Thread starter
- #1
Good signing. 3 years/$27M.... Curry is not that bad, Eagles just had such ridiculous D-Line depth last year that he didn't see as many snaps. Only 642 in total while Michael Bennett (the replacement) saw nearly 950... so the stats Curry put up I think are not too far off. IMO Bennett is a worse replacement for Curry more than Eagles fans think, not to mention Bennett has far more wear and tear and is 2.5 years older. IMO Bennett is a downgrade from Curry who was 4 points lower on PFF not to mention the aforementioned age/wear, but I'm sure Eagles fans will flip out and claim I'm bitter and don't know what I'm talking about...
Anyway, enough of humbling Eagles fans, it's a solid signing for the Bucs. $9M is not that much and a team like the Bucs are going to have to pay a bit of a premium. I think Curry will produce solid in Tampa and he'll only be 30.
B+ grade. Grade in the As would've warranted a sub $25M contract.
No and no. Just doing it to keep content on the NFL board until the draft gets closerI am still new enough around here that i have never experienced an nfl offseason on this site, and I'm noticing that every thread is made by the same poster. Is it by design or are you just Ian Rappoport's SportsHoopla profile?