• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Game Thread: 5/22 Blachparty @Chubbs

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
59,308
15,683
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,400.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Well, we could ask for two more wins and two fewer losses.
You CAN ask, but everyone will be looking at you like...

photo.jpg
 

1phlapdown

Well-Known Member
6,429
1,063
173
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Location
lax
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Next up JC, who really needs to start KNUCKLING DOWN if the season is going to be saved. Perhaps the kid doing well will motivate some of the laggers.
 

SFGRTB

Superstitious Fan
17,103
2,531
293
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
Eugene, OR and Lake Tahoe
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
If we lose this, it's on Noggin.

Blach had 94 pitches after 7. Shoulda pinch hit for him in the 8th. Blach had no business being in there for the 8th.

I think the worst part is that no one was warming up. After the homer, no one was ready.
 

tzill

Lefty 99
25,143
6,365
533
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Francisco
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,064.42
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
If we lose this, it's on Noggin.

Blach had 94 pitches after 7. Shoulda pinch hit for him in the 8th. Blach had no business being in there for the 8th.

That was kind of my feeling while I was watching.

Then, I remembered that Boch is a HOF manager and knows 100x what I do about baseball in general and his team in particular.
 

tzill

Lefty 99
25,143
6,365
533
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Francisco
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,064.42
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I just read today that Belt's BABIP this year is .298. His career BABIP is .339. The dude should start getting even better at some point this season.

Maybe. There are a bunch of debates rolling around the interwebs arguing about BABIP and its sustainability/luck. Conventional wisdom that average BABIP is right around .300. Thus, maybe BB9 has been lucky up til now and he's reverting to the mean? :noidea:
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
59,308
15,683
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,400.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I am not a huge believer in the fact that BABIP tells a whole lot. Matt Moore will naturally, even with infinite ABs, have a lower BABIP than Barry Bonds. This because Moore would not square up the same way Bonds would.

Take that extreme example, tighten it up, and apply it to an individual player.

Panik, when in the zone and not suffering from concussions or a broken back would naturally have a higher BABIP than a concussed Panik in traction. No luck involved.
 

LHG

Former Californian. Hesitant Tennessean.
17,552
7,684
533
Joined
Aug 1, 2015
Location
Laguna Hills, CA, United States
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I am not a huge believer in the fact that BABIP tells a whole lot. Matt Moore will naturally, even with infinite ABs, have a lower BABIP than Barry Bonds. This because Moore would not square up the same way Bonds would.

Take that extreme example, tighten it up, and apply it to an individual player.

Panik, when in the zone and not suffering from concussions or a broken back would naturally have a higher BABIP than a concussed Panik in traction. No luck involved.
Maybe I misunderstand your post but we aren't comparing Belt to anyone better or worse than himself and a healthy vs. an injured version (that I'm aware of). Assuming that the amount of balls he puts in play becoming hits go back to what is typical for him, he should start raising the average and slugging percentage.
 

LHG

Former Californian. Hesitant Tennessean.
17,552
7,684
533
Joined
Aug 1, 2015
Location
Laguna Hills, CA, United States
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Maybe. There are a bunch of debates rolling around the interwebs arguing about BABIP and its sustainability/luck. Conventional wisdom that average BABIP is right around .300. Thus, maybe BB9 has been lucky up til now and he's reverting to the mean? :noidea:
Maybe but he's got enough at-bats that say .298 BABIP is low for him. So either he has a down year for him or his numbers start climbing at some point.
 

tzill

Lefty 99
25,143
6,365
533
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Francisco
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,064.42
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Maybe but he's got enough at-bats that say .298 BABIP is low for him. So either he has a down year for him or his numbers start climbing at some point.

I don't have a dog in this fight, but there are a lot of people a lot smarter than I who would say that .298 BABIP is about right for just about every hitter.
 

LHG

Former Californian. Hesitant Tennessean.
17,552
7,684
533
Joined
Aug 1, 2015
Location
Laguna Hills, CA, United States
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I don't have a dog in this fight, but there are a lot of people a lot smarter than I who would say that .298 BABIP is about right for just about every hitter.
I guess I would need to read some of the arguments but it but it doesn't make sense, from a very uninformed position, how that would be the case for all hitters but batting average, on base and slugging percentages can vary wildly from one player to another. Sure, there are medians for all three, that doesn't mean that all hitters will tend toward the median in any of them. When there is a well established history of how a player performs, as long as there is consistency and the player isn't in the decline phase of his career, I don't see how that norm is not to be expected.
 

tzill

Lefty 99
25,143
6,365
533
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Francisco
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,064.42
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I guess I would need to read some of the arguments but it but it doesn't make sense, from a very uninformed position, how that would be the case for all hitters but batting average, on base and slugging percentages can vary wildly from one player to another. Sure, there are medians for all three, that doesn't mean that all hitters will tend toward the median in any of them. When there is a well established history of how a player performs, as long as there is consistency and the player isn't in the decline phase of his career, I don't see how that norm is not to be expected.

I see your point, but there are a bunch of advanced analyses that show that pretty much everyone reverts to about .300 BABIP. Now, some players put a ton more balls in play than others, so their average will be higher but that's the mean.

A similar argument raged on the interwebs years ago about Cain and his HR rate given his propensity for fly balls. I think the consensus is that eventually he'd revert to the mean and he did.
 
Top