You know we'll be eligible. :yahoo:
And if they've accepted a bowl invite towards the end of the season based on conference finish, they will have no incentive to play. I can't see them sitting at 5 or 6 wins, where it might make a difference.
I'm conference-rival joking, of course. DG whined a little bit after the PSU game last year. Iowa has great crowds usually and it looks like tge schedule is set up well for a run at the West title.
Not bad. I don't like the fishnet pattern on the helmet, but other than that, it's pretty cool.
I cringed at the thread title dreading some kelly green nightmare.
lol @ eco mode.
I'm not too big on the Avenger-Charger-Durango styling. They made a concerted effort to kind of keep them all the same, just getting bigger.
At least the Challenger looks unique. I liked the look of the Charger at first (hated the interior of one I drove), until waaaaay too...
I'm not too concerned at all about depth if they get in the 80+ scholarship range.
To clarify, a high-ranking 2016 EE is preferable to me than a less ready-2015 guy just taken to fill spots (but redshirts). Neither is available next season but the high-ceiling kid would provide more...
For me, 1 OL, 1 DL and 1 DB and I think we're good in "needs met". Then best available with high-ranking studs. Take all high ranking kids willing to come. I have no problem saving slots for 2016 to look for an early entry kid rather than redshirting a 3* from the 2015 class. Balancing the...