Search results

Every play but short yardage the defense is playing pass first.

You're just proving the average pothead would tear you up in a debate.

For luck, every play is an obvious pass play. Every defensive play call but a short yardage one is called with a pass first defense in mind. They may get caught by an occasional run but that doesn't mean they will worry about it. They don't need to. For Wilson, it's the opposite. Except for...

Please, provide legitimate research that demonstrates one long term negative effect. There isn't any.

It's simply not true. Wilson passes in more than obvious passing downs and has a relatively short distance to go for most of his attempts, and having the gameplan solely target you is far more of a challenge than passing only on obvious passing downs even if that were the case, which it is not.

The research is overwhelmingly in favor of an extremely long list of benefits, and legitimate research has demonstrated zero long term negatives to use. None.

And luck was hit more than Wilson, by a wide margin. The difference is luck gets the ball out and Wilson looks to extend the play.

Yes, they will. The research will demonstrate more convincingly that it helps prevent head trauma and the league will have no choice. Goodell even kept the door open on it. The idiots are the one who ignore scientific fact to spread ignorant bullshit about something consistently demonstrated...

They don't have to advocate it. They simply have to stop punishing it. And they will do so.

Why 2014 FIFA World Cup is skipping PS4 and Xbox One • Eurogamer.net Not a rights issue. It's a development time issue it seems.

Someone was trying to compare luck's numbers to Wilson's, while ignoring the obvious fact that teams gameplan exclusively to stop luck and essentially not at all to stop Wilson. I simply corrected that. It's not complicated and I'm not sure why it's confusing so many.

So much better.

Yeah, it's great for the Seahawks. My only point is that it effects the numbers comparison when you're comparing him to a guy who teams know is throwing every play and has just as few weapons.

I meant madden but that sounds pretty good too.

Play real football instead. :thumb:

They're hit or miss but you get two free games a month and some discounts and shit. Much better deal than live.

I'm not a hardcore FIFA gamer by any means, but if any of you guys want to play a game or two my PSN is jdm9970

Judging from the new version, I don't think it was as much coasting as much as I honestly think they were maxed out on what the console could do. Within those restrictions, each successive version had noticeably significantly improved gameplay, from the football perspective. As I already said...

I just bought it last night. Out of curiosity, what console do you have oregonducks?

I really wish they would take career designers of FIFA and put them to work on madden. I could easily see myself playing through a career at literally every position but punter.

FIFA is definitely good. It is also much more playable single player than madden.

Suh. The lions have nothing.

Yes, teams gameplan to stop the ground game, not to deal with Wilson. With luck, the only focus is on stopping him. The ground game doesn't matter. How teams prepare for your team matters.

Peyton, yes. For all his issues in the clutch, those are discussions that affect the perception of him among the all time greats, not as one of the best 2 of his era. Romo is a joke. Awful decision maker who gets even worse with the game on the line.