2016 New York Rangers On Going Thread

stealth · Mar 18, 2017

Pastafazul said:
is there 1 rangers player who looks like they really give a schitt? 1 who takes control? wonder Y no cups? not 1 player on this team takes charge.... i guess when your highest paid, most respected teammate is mr softee himself rick nash, you really don't need to look any further

Raanta.....he played really well against a top tier team with 6 Rangers being scratched for the game. 10 games left for Raanta to get some prior postseason experience with a playoff regular season ending....like I said before Its time to shine!! :mad2:

Pastafazul · Mar 19, 2017

CLEARLY, the west is weak, the east will take it.... pitt wash rangers...which one takes it.. i say pitt! 2 of our last 10 vs them, a preview of what's to come, ... should be interesting

wash jackets, choke PS

stealth · Mar 19, 2017

Pastafazul said:
CLEARLY, the west is weak, the east will take it.... pitt wash rangers...which one takes it.. i say pitt! 2 of our last 10 vs them, a preview of what's to come, ... should be interesting

wash jackets, choke PS

Im with ya there!.....Murray got robbed of the MVP trophy in last year's cup final the so=called experts chose Sid!

If Raanta has his form back like he did in the beginning to middle the Rangers might do some damage. Hank is mystery!

Pastafazul · Mar 19, 2017

Yes the rangers can win with raanta in net, as pitt won with murray, no doubt. its moot any way cause blundy with be in net!

"HOWEVER"!!!!! ARG!!!!!! Staal, girardi, mcdonagh, holden, what i call the SORE 4, will be the difference imo.

We know Nash aint scorin.... gonna be grabner ,vecey, maybe i say maybe kreider shines.....

Pastafazul · Mar 21, 2017

raanta just as good as blundy at this point, girardi and klein coming back... how bout girardi taking an extended vacation..... skiej, holden, klein, mcdogschitt, schittstool, smith only decent chance we have on the defensive end

stealth · Mar 21, 2017

Pastafazul said:
raanta just as good as blundy at this point, girardi and klein coming back... how bout girardi taking an extended vacation..... skiej, holden, klein, mcdogschitt, schittstool, smith only decent chance we have on the defensive end

forgetting Brendan Smith ....good defender

Pastafazul · Mar 22, 2017

stealth said:
forgetting Brendan Smith ....good defender

he's in there, after schittstool

typical game vs the devs... freekin exciting as heck, but what the heck ,157 shots on goal and only 2 .... aahhhh wtf got a pt

David_son · Mar 22, 2017

The worst part about the Smith deal is that once Girardi and Klein come back who will be sitting Skjei one of our best defensemen only cause AV cant stand to sit veterans.

Pastafazul · Mar 22, 2017

David_son said:
The worst part about the Smith deal is that once Girardi and Klein come back who will be sitting Skjei one of our best defensemen only cause AV cant stand to sit veterans.

nah, skjei scores goals, he's safe!! i believe girardi is man enough to put team 1st, what that means is... ummmmm ahhhhhhh

Pastafazul · Mar 22, 2017

NEVER, have i considered myself a greedy rangers fan, but i have to say, this team really is going nowhere, and its a dam shame, because they are good enough. But, when you can't put away teams like the devs, isles etc. you don't deserve to win a thing! ... That sschitt fans say 'these games don't mean anything is BS... you win in hockey by going into PS HOT! the rangers are going through the motions, and are going to get their azzezz handed to them 1st round! Also, do they really expect the injured to come back and be ready for battle???

stealth · Mar 26, 2017

Raanta gets a shutout and the media claims Hank is going to start against the Ducks. AV's mind is not on winning if Hank starts, he usually loses when coming back from a period of time.

stealth · Mar 26, 2017

same old effin Hank cant keep a lead for effin nothing...he is total piece of shit. not 1 blown lead but 2 in the first period alone. 2 goals on 16 shots sucks!!! If I'm the GM I would trade his ass over the summer

stealth · Mar 26, 2017

Game Over ......AV should have never started Hank especially after Raanta has a shutout. effin amazingly stupid!

TRADE CHOKE KING......he has given up the most short-handed goals this season.

stealth · Mar 26, 2017

If AV pulls Hank now the Rangers might have a chance for a comeback

stealth · Mar 26, 2017

Pastafazul said:
nah, skjei scores goals, he's safe!! i believe girardi is man enough to put team 1st, what that means is... ummmmm ahhhhhhh

Skjei only has 5 goals including tonights game vs the ducks

stealth · Mar 26, 2017

why didn't av pull Hank after the second period......it was obvious Hank wasn't going to get any better.....what in the name of good sense is wrong here?

David_son · Mar 27, 2017

stealth said:
Raanta gets a shutout and the media claims Hank is going to start against the Ducks. AV's mind is not on winning if Hank starts, he usually loses when coming back from a period of time.

Not that he played well but really are you just not going to start him the rest of the season. Even if AV decides to use Raanta as the #1 going forward Raanta has played every game since Hanks injury and needs a rest. You just cant let him ride the bench the rest of the year.

David_son · Mar 27, 2017

stealth said:
same old effin Hank cant keep a lead for effin nothing...he is total piece of shit. not 1 blown lead but 2 in the first period alone. 2 goals on 16 shots sucks!!! If I'm the GM I would trade his ass over the summer

He has a NM so does Staal I personally believe that they both would be gone already if they didnt. Girardi as well. Lets home Gordon has the good sense to buy out Girardi in the offseason.

Pastafazul · Mar 27, 2017

lol, hank playing in montreal, habs in 6

stealth · Mar 28, 2017

Pastafazul said:
lol, hank playing in montreal, habs in 6

I still say the Rangers play better with Raanta and at least the Rangers could win 2 with Raanta whereas with Hank we get swept

2016 New York Rangers On Going Thread

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

I'm so confused

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

I'm so confused

I'm so confused

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads