Will Khalil Mack Get Traded

DirtDirtDirt · Aug 14, 2018

There is A Moose at 3rd said:
“I wouldn’t give up multiple 1sts for a HOF level talent with 3 years of control”

-SportsHoopla

Don't hate him, just seems the NFL world goes Gaga over his 5 sack game, and is very quiet for the next 4 weeks

Fountain City Blues · Aug 14, 2018

DirtDirtDirt said:
Don't hate him, just seems the NFL world goes Gaga over his 5 sack game, and is very quiet for the next 4 weeks

Ehhhh. Even great edge guys have quiet stretches in the sack department. Teams don’t let you stack sacks for free these days like a certain guy named Strahan...

Ricky Roma · Aug 14, 2018

Mack is up there with V. Miller at edge....he's most definitely worth a first rounder plus....

MileHigh64 · Aug 14, 2018

I hate Mack because he dons the Silver and Black every week. However, he's a GREAT player and will get paid somewhere. I think people that criticize him get caught up in sack numbers alone. He does more than that and plays on a shitty defense. I still think that the Raiders and Mack will come to some terms. Great pass rushers and physical guys like Khalil Mack just don't grow on trees.

nebearsfan70 · Aug 14, 2018

Just read the Bears are 5:1 odds to get Mack.

rmilia1 · Aug 14, 2018

Pack would be stupid to give up too much D is going to be below average even with Mack and paying him and then Rodgers basically ends your chances of winning anything

Fountain City Blues · Aug 15, 2018

rmilia1 said:
Pack would be stupid to give up too much D is going to be below average even with Mack and paying him and then Rodgers basically ends your chances of winning anything

Not really because the QB payscale is capped and is subject to diminishing returns. Rodgers is still one of the best values in the NFL even after he is paid.

DirtDirtDirt · Aug 15, 2018

rmilia1 said:
Pack would be stupid to give up too much D is going to be below average even with Mack and paying him and then Rodgers basically ends your chances of winning anything

Are their chances increased without Mack?

rmilia1 · Aug 15, 2018

DirtDirtDirt said:
Are their chances increased without Mack?

No but that team is pretty devoid of talent other than Rodgers. They've got a few other good but not great players. It may make them better this year but still wouldn't be the best team even in the North. Just not sure it's worth it long term. If they go for it it may be a sign of how many great years they think Rodgers has left

DirtDirtDirt · Aug 15, 2018

rmilia1 said:
No but that team is pretty devoid of talent other than Rodgers. They've got a few other good but not great players. It may make them better this year but still wouldn't be the best team even in the North. Just not sure it's worth it long term. If they go for it it may be a sign of how many great years they think Rodgers has left

Be interesting to see how those corners work out
They took 2 of the top guys correct?

rmilia1 · Aug 15, 2018

DirtDirtDirt said:
Be interesting to see how those corners work out
They took 2 of the top guys correct?

Yep. Personally I think they got 2 of the best 3 in the draft. Huge upgrade. Thats the real wildcard of the season for them

Ricky Roma · Aug 15, 2018

The Packers would be one of the best locations for someone like Mack. Rodgers can carry that entire franchise....most certainly the offense practically by himself. Load up on defense, and that team could make several SB runs.

Battlelyon · Aug 22, 2018

Fountain City Blues · Aug 22, 2018

Man, I am getting Marcus Peters hotflashes with this shit.

Fuck off, Raiders.

(Trade Mack to my adopted Bears though)

Sharkonabicycle · Aug 22, 2018

DirtDirtDirt said:
Packers or Jets make the most sense

Packers because its time they make a defensive splash and give Rodgers a chance at another ring, that defense is beyond disgraceful for as long as I can remember

Jets because they desperately need a pass rusher and they have a ton of cap space, and seem to be heading in a good direction organizationally

Did you pay attention to the offseason? They got Wilkerson on a bargain PROVE it contract, spent their first 3 picks on defense (1st and 2nd were CORNERS which was the big need), and signed Tramon Williams. They were top 5 in sacks... the big issue with the Packers is their secondary is ATROCIOUS. What they did in the offseason was 100% focused on that. Mack will of course indirectly help any secondary, but the Packers should still be looking to get at least 5 more years out of Rodgers and bringing in Mack and giving him $20M+ is going to tank that team.

About the only team Mack can go to and not tank... is something like the Jets because their QB is cheap-o for the next 4 years.

I'm actually hoping the Rams give Donald $20M+ a year because that whole thing is going to fall the fuck apart when Goff demands $20M+ if he keeps it up along with Gurley. Good luck winning with that unless you absolutely NAIL the draft nearly every year (by signing 2 of the top 3 positions with most common injuries - RB/DT - Center is #2).

lol Green Bay sign Mack. I swear some of you guys are building fantasy teams on Madden too often.

Fountain City Blues · Aug 22, 2018

Sharkonabicycle said:
Did you pay attention to the offseason? They got Wilkerson on a bargain PROVE it contract, spent their first 3 picks on defense (1st and 2nd were CORNERS which was the big need), and signed Tramon Williams. They were top 5 in sacks... the big issue with the Packers is their secondary is ATROCIOUS. What they did in the offseason was 100% focused on that. Mack will of course indirectly help any secondary, but the Packers should still be looking to get at least 5 more years out of Rodgers and bringing in Mack and giving him $20M+ is going to tank that team.

About the only team Mack can go to and not tank... is something like the Jets because their QB is cheap-o for the next 4 years.

I'm actually hoping the Rams give Donald $20M+ a year because that whole thing is going to fall the fuck apart when Goff demands $20M+ if he keeps it up along with Gurley. Good luck winning with that unless you absolutely NAIL the draft nearly every year (by signing 2 of the top 3 positions with most common injuries - RB/DT - Center is #2).

lol Green Bay sign Mack. I swear some of you guys are building fantasy teams on Madden too often.

Um, the Packers will be fine if they grab Mack. They aren't drafting anyone nearly as good as Mack the next two years, I can just about mark it down with a bookie.

NinerSickness · Aug 22, 2018

Courtesy of ChrisPozz, Niner-fan HOFer:

Jets reach out to Raiders to express interest in trading for disgruntled All-Pro Khalil Mack, per sources - NY Daily News

Jets reach out to Raiders to express interest in trading for disgruntled All-Pro Khalil Mack, per sources

Fountain City Blues · Aug 22, 2018

NinerSickness said:
Courtesy of ChrisPozz, Niner-fan HOFer:

Jets reach out to Raiders to express interest in trading for disgruntled All-Pro Khalil Mack, per sources - NY Daily News

Jets reach out to Raiders to express interest in trading for disgruntled All-Pro Khalil Mack, per sources

The drumbeat keeps getting louder man...

Fountain City Blues · Aug 22, 2018

Fountain City Blues · Aug 23, 2018

Will Khalil Mack Get Traded

Well-Known Member

Love Everybody

The Catch

Broncos Fanatic

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Love Everybody

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

The Catch

2021 Super Bowl Champions Rams

Love Everybody

Bipedal Sea Dog

Love Everybody

Well-Known Member

Love Everybody

Love Everybody

Love Everybody

Similar threads